Subject:
|
Re: "gutless" bush?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 20:20:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
524 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Johann writes:
> Now it's time to get back to basics and finish the job that Billy wouldn't
> do: Operation Bye, bye Saddam...
Why?
I wouldn't have cared if Saddam had been allowed to thumb his nose at
resolution after resolution after resolution, ad infinitum...I have no ego
investment in making others obey my every word, as long as they also keep
the peace. Everyone having WMD means keeping the peace because it also
means "mutually assured destruction." And nobody really wants to die unless
you back them into a corner.
I see that your ego is not quite as resilient as my own.
-- Hop-Frog
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: "gutless" bush?
|
| (...) I'll agree completely that 'keeping the peace' is the paramount concern here. That, and the prevention of the proliferation of more WOMD. Saddam thumbed his nose at the UN resolutions and sanctions imposed on his country. Now it's time to put (...) (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: "gutless" bush?
|
| (...) Yes, the invasion of Kuwait is over. That business is finished. What was never finished was the removal of Saddam Hussein from his nice, cozy position of power. This is something Papa couldn't finish and something Hill Billy Clinton wouldn't (...) (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
65 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
