Subject:
|
Re: "gutless" bush?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 20:42:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
560 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Johann writes:
> Last time I checked, no one really wants to die even when backed into a
> corner. Saddam had his chance to get out of that corner. HE could have
> easily gone under the radar and helped his countrymen prevent this by
> stepping down and walking away. HE chose not to do this. HE chose this end
> result. Case closed.
I thought what was wanted was justice for the "helpless" Iraqi people? Why
should we let SH slip away quietly when it is our "claimed" agenda to make
him pay for his supposed crimes? Or is there another agenda that doesn't
care about justice or democracy for Iraq? As long as he walks away from the
oil, right?
You poor deluded fool.
-- Hop-Frog
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: "gutless" bush?
|
| (...) I'll agree completely that 'keeping the peace' is the paramount concern here. That, and the prevention of the proliferation of more WOMD. Saddam thumbed his nose at the UN resolutions and sanctions imposed on his country. Now it's time to put (...) (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
65 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
