To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 19528
19527  |  19529
Subject: 
Re: This just came across my desk... Iraqi Questions
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 10:04:10 GMT
Viewed: 
441 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Terry Prosper writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
The UN is broken. The Security Council is especially broken.

It's broken because of USA.  This war proves that USA should be disarmed
once and for all.  Enough with USA's permanent wars.  For over 50 years now
USA has been the terror regime holding the world on the brink of a nuclear
war.  USA should be disarmed, UN should control your goverment for a while
until Bush is trialed for crime against humanity.

But it's a dream, it won't happen, I know...

Spoken like a true Canadian.

<rant>
I find it interesting that even with all the disarming of our military power
over the past 20 years, that there are folks calling for even more dispersal
of our meager military might. Want to prevent the US from 'holding the world
on the brink of a nuclear war'? Start by disarming countries that insist on
having a standing army of a quarter million people. Continue by eliminating
those that pursecute others on the basis of race, sex, age, or religion.
Finalize the solution by eliminating the outdated ideals of 1945 by
eradicating the UN and setting up a REAL world political power.

btw, for the moment GWB hasn't committed any crimes against humanity.
Against Texas, yes, but that's another story.

The UN is broken, but NOT because of the US. It's broken because it hasn't
grown with the times. We're still living with the ideals set up when the UN
was created. They might not have noticed, but the world has changed since
1945. The real mistake was setting up the Security Council with a permanant
membership rather than one based on world interest. Where's the largest
populations of the world represented? The largest geographical areas? They
aren't there...instead we get France. What a freaking joke.

</rant>
-Dave (who doesn't want war, but will back Bush for the next week or so.
After that, we'll see.)



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: This just came across my desk... Iraqi Questions
 
LET THIS BE CLEAR : I AM NOT CANADIAN. You want to know Canada's opinion on the issue? Well, there is Ontario, who is against a war without the UN, but wishes the US wil win the war. Totally opposite statements. That's Ontario for you. Then there is (...) (21 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: This just came across my desk... Iraqi Questions
 
(...) It's broken because of USA. This war proves that USA should be disarmed once and for all. Enough with USA's permanent wars. For over 50 years now USA has been the terror regime holding the world on the brink of a nuclear war. USA should be (...) (21 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

64 Messages in This Thread:





















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR