Subject:
|
Re: This just came across my desk... Iraqi Questions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 19 Mar 2003 20:29:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
225 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:
> > > Subject: Questions
> > >
> > > Do you know enough to justify going to war with Iraq?
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > Q: Who is responsible for killing more MUSLIMS than anyone else in the world?
What, no guess?
> > Q: Who is about to order the unleashing of chemical and/or biological weapons
> > on US troops that he always claimed he never had?
>
> Thus far none have been released, and none would have been released if there
> was no war.
Uh, we don't know that.
> They may have been found by the inspectors, if given the time
> needed, and even if not--you let a tiger roam around, you may not get
> attecked--you back him into a corner, you *will* get bitten.
Or, he could just attack you for no reason.
>
> You will have caused the very thing you're griping about--the unleashing of
> weapons. "See??? He had 'em all along!! This proves we were right!" This
> isn't Justice at all.
I don't get your point.
>
> Iraq didn't kick the inspectors out--your agressive stance forced the
> inspectors out.
Dave, Dave, Dave, David. When will you and the UN and the Left learn-- weapons
inspections are a JOKE. Do we need anymore living examples other than North
Korea to finally understand this?
>
> >
> > Q: Who's self-proclaimed hero is Joseph Stalin?
What, no guess?
>
> What did your (and Canada, I will admit) country do to Native Americans?
>
> Sanctimonious BS. "He who is without sin..." Your self proclaimed American
> heros committed atrocities as well, but you glorify them. A quick example
> of "Americanisms"--Benedict Arnold--a hero to the British, a very very bad
> man to the Americans. Is amazing how history gets written.
Okay, fine. We are ALL guilty, we are all evil. George W. Bush is the same as
Joseph Stalin. We are all morally equivalent. Whatever Dave.
>
> >
> >
> > This impending war is and always has been with the *regime* that oppresses the
> > people of Iraq, not with the people of Iraq. It goes forward only because SH
> > refuses to relinquish power. Short of assassination, it is the only way to get
> > rid of him. It ends when he is deposed. Period.
>
> I like that--first its give up the weapons, then it's to liberate Iraq, and
> now its to get rid of SH and introduce democracy--trying to find a good
> 'nuff reason to appease the masses?
No, Dave, it went like this:
1. Iraq attacks Kuwait
2. We repel Saddam, and under condition of surrender, he agrees to disarm.
3. 11 years later, not only *hasn't* he disarmed, but has been stockpiling
chemical and biological weapons AND is pursuing Nukes.
4. We decide enough is enough, Sadam is out-- by force if necessary.
>
> >
> > I believe we will be *thanked* by the people of Iraq for liberating them from
> > the brutal tyranny under which they have been existing. With the God-given
> > natural resources at their disposal, Iraq has the means to becoming a shining
> > star for Democracy and Freedom in the Middle East.
> >
> > JOHN
>
> Wow John, You actually believe this? Like Afganistan?
I do. Afganistan also hasn't been blessed with the natural resources Iraq has,
and so the road will be tougher. And I said Iraq has the *potential*-- whether
they choose that path remains to be seen.
>
> Yeah, I'll send a personal "Thank You" letter to Dubya if, say, after the
> dust has cleared, this is what actually happens.
From the sidelines. Don't bother.
JOHN
> Dave K
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
64 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
