| |
On Thu, 8 Jul 1999 16:51:29 GMT, "Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
> in <http://www.lugnet.com/admin/database/?n=326> I was referring specifically
> to the ongoing work on the LUGNET and AucZILLA parts databases. In other
> words, the name "Brictionary" (or "Bricktionary") wasn't being tossed out
> as something up for grabs. It's something I thought of many many moons ago,
> and something I hold dear to my heart, and part of the only reason I
> mentioned the name on this thread was to establish priority with respect to
> the name, in case someone else were to independently think of it and believe
> that it was their idea first.
Great. I'd love to contribute to the Lugnet Bricktionary in any way
possible.
Of course, I'd love to contribute to just about any effort to establish a
public db for part identification and reference.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: The Bricktionary project (Was: Idea: How starting ... Lego piece naming convention?)
|
| (...) Oops -- I think there has been a major misunderstanding; that's not what I meant at all. When I wrote: TSL> As they say in Canada, Minnesota, and Maine, "O-ya, it's been parta da TSL> plan since day one." :-) Lots of little prototypes and (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.general)
|
80 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Database
|
|
|
|
|
|
