Subject:
|
Re: Progress so far, and a new header
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.faq
|
Date:
|
Wed, 28 Apr 1999 18:57:17 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
jsproat@&SayNoToSpam&geocities.com
|
Viewed:
|
1665 times
|
| |
|
|
Another header...?
I want to be able to make context-specific notes on the FAQ items, which
will not be exposed in the final output. I'm thinking of something like a
Comment: header, which the parser will discard during processing.
Cheers,
- jsproat
--
Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@geocities.com>
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Horizon/5249/
"I prefer the term para-mental. It keeps me out of the loony bin."
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Progress so far, and a new header
|
| Jeremy: (...) Both the "Originator" and the "Comment" header entries make sense. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- Here's the edited list of header entries (please verify that I haven't (...) (26 years ago, 29-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Progress so far, and a new header
|
| FAQ crew, I've gathered 23 questions for the FAQ so far (1), and stuffed them into a holding patteren until the header format is closer to being finalized. In the mean time: I feel that we should allow an Originator header, to give credit towards (...) (26 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
82 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
