Subject:
|
Re: Progress so far, and a new header
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.faq
|
Date:
|
Fri, 7 May 1999 20:06:26 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
JSPROAT@antispamGEOCITIES.COM
|
Viewed:
|
2467 times
|
| |
|
|
Sproaticus wrote:
> How about just copying the "X-Ref:" header char for char?
The more I think about it, the more I think that this is exactly what I'm
oging to do. The "Reference:" header would be a fully-formed URL, while the
"X-Ref:" header would tell the parser that it needs to be resolved into a
LUGNET article URL.
Cheers,
- jsproat
--
Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@geocities.com>
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Horizon/5249/
"I prefer the term para-mental. It keeps me out of the loony bin."
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Progress so far, and a new header
|
| (...) But don't copy the name 'X-Ref' if you copy the data -- that would be wicked confusing because what you want is a reference to a prior article, and the 'X-Ref' header of NNTP articles *isn't* a reference to a prior article but rather an ID of (...) (26 years ago, 8-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Progress so far, and a new header
|
| (...) I was afraid of that. :-, (...) I'm prone to just go with the simpler form, copying the X-Ref header, for several reasons: a) I don't have to enter the Web interface and search for messages to find the URL, b) The URL can be automagically (...) (26 years ago, 7-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
82 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
