Subject:
|
Re: Progress so far, and a new header
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.faq
|
Date:
|
Fri, 30 Apr 1999 04:01:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1781 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.faq, jsproat@geocities.com (Sproaticus) writes:
> FAQ crew,
Gesundheit!
> I've gathered 23 questions for the FAQ so far (1), and stuffed them into a
> holding patteren until the header format is closer to being finalized.
Dude! All right!
> [...]
> Subject: What are "Samsonite" Legos?
> [...]
In cases like this, it's perfectly OK to correct typos and misuses of
trademarks (especially TLG trademarks). That is to say, this question could
just as well be re-written as:
Subject: What is Samsonite?
or
Subject: What does Samsonite have to do with LEGO?
or
Subject: Did Samsonite really ever sell LEGO products?
Questions shown in FAQs don't necessarily have to be the exact question that
was originally posed. In fact, the original verbatim question often
includes hidden contextual information or assumptions.
Editing is good. Editing is good. Editing is good. Editing is good. :)
> <P>It appears Samsonite (of briefcase fame) has imported/made Lego
^^^^
^^^^
TLG requests in their trademark information packet that all of their marks
(*especially* LEGO) always be written in all-caps. It is OK, however, to
write "Lego" when referring to the company per se, for example, "The Lego
Group" or "Lego Systems, Inc." But when the mark is used as an adjective
(i.e., "LEGO products") then it has to be uppercase. If in doubt, simply
always use uppercase (that's the best example to set anyway).
> products in the US under licence before TLG actually got out there.
> lesse, they just had a 25-yr asnniversary of Real Lego, so that makes
^^^^^ ^^^^ ^ ^^^^^^^^^
????? when ? huh??????
> to 73, probably from somewhere in the 60s.
Say, by chance was this snippet a direct unedited quote from a news article?
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Progress so far, and a new header
|
| (...) Someone's taking cheap snots at my text... :-P (...) Yep. Path of least resistance for now. :-, I have every intention of editing these items, but with only 23 for right now, I'm still getting a feel for it. The FAQ items will be significantly (...) (26 years ago, 30-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Progress so far, and a new header
|
| FAQ crew, I've gathered 23 questions for the FAQ so far (1), and stuffed them into a holding patteren until the header format is closer to being finalized. In the mean time: I feel that we should allow an Originator header, to give credit towards (...) (26 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
82 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
