Subject:
|
Re: Raw FAQ data format (Was: Format of FAQ items)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.faq
|
Date:
|
Thu, 29 Apr 1999 10:21:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2257 times
|
| |
|
|
Jeremy:
> Oh waitaminute. I think I see where the confusion is. I'm not suggesting
> that the header text from the included file be inserted into the including
> file.
I didn't think so. What I tried to explain was how the
processing tools would see the file _after_ the "Include"
header had been processed.
> What I mean to say is that during processing of the files, when the
> including file resides in memory, it would use headers in the included file
> that are not already defined in the including file. The text in the file
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is the critical part. I hadn't noticed it earlier.
> would remain the same.
>
> Some headers wouldn't make a whole lot of sense, such as Revision and
> Subject. However, some -- such as Content-Language and Locations -- would
> make wonderful use of Include.
Yes.
Play well,
Jacob
------------------------------------------------------------
-- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk --
-- Web...: <URL:http://hugin.risoe.dk/JJ_Memorial/FAQ/> --
------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Raw FAQ data format (Was: Format of FAQ items)
|
| (...) Oh waitaminute. I think I see where the confusion is. I'm not suggesting that the header text from the included file be inserted into the including file. What I mean to say is that during processing of the files, when the including file (...) (26 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
82 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
