Subject:
|
Re: Format of FAQ items
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.faq
|
Date:
|
Mon, 26 Apr 1999 14:23:11 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
jsproat@geocities.SAYNOTOSPAMcom
|
Viewed:
|
4574 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote:
> Maybe we're thinking of different kids of include mechanisms... I'm not
> thinking of the kind that includes other files for their definitions... I'm
> thinking of the kind that says, "slurp in this other file of data and all of
> its other sub-files of data" -- like the way an MPD works, for example. Can
> you give some examples of usages of the other kind, where you'd just want to
> pull in headers?
Sure -- suppose you have a directory full of FAQ items, some of which have
pretty much the same headers. e.g.
Locations: /x/y/,/x/z/,/x/,/
Content-Language: qw
Translated-From: er
Topic-Level: 1
Instead of maintaining each of these in every file, each file (that wanted
to) could include these headers from another file.
I'm not really committed to this idea; I just hope I'm making sense. :-S
Cheers,
- jsproat
--
Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@geocities.com>
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Horizon/5249/
"I prefer the term para-mental. It keeps me out of the loony bin."
obconspiracy: MIT plots with the Gnomes of Zurich, to clone a convention of
slithy scientists from the mall down the street, in order to not put the pi
symbol at the bottom of your computer monitor.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Format of FAQ items
|
| (...) Yes & no. 'Yes' in that a master TOC would/could appear. But 'no' in that the master TOC would just be a special case of a general-purpose sub- hierarchy TOC, which just happens to start at the top. I built one of these just for fun a couple (...) (27 years ago, 25-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
82 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
