Subject:
|
Re: Tags
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.faq
|
Date:
|
Sun, 9 May 1999 03:38:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3002 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.faq, jsproat@geocities.com (Sproaticus) writes:
> Todd Lehman wrote:
> > In lugnet.faq, jsproat@geocities.com (Sproaticus) writes:
> > > How about H5 or H6, then?
> > Heh heh. Well, <H4> is typically the same size as the base font, but in
> > bold, so I don't think anything but <H3> is needed, if that even is.
>
> SO we just reserve H1 and H2 for the parser? I can live with that.
Parser?
As in document validation or transmogrification?
> > Alternatives to <H3>x</H3> might be <P><B>x</B></P> or [maybe] better yet
> > <P CLASS=y><B>x</B></P>...?
>
> Is the "CLASS=y" attribute part of CSS?
Yup, but not in a bad way as long as some sort of backward-compatible non-
CSS code (such as <B></B>) were used in combination with <P></P> for section
titles. That is, on old browsers a section title of
<P CLASS=Section>Section Title</P>
Would show up as a normal paragraph, but a section title of
<P CLASS=Section><B>Section Title</B></P>
would at least show up as a boldfaced line of text. A simple CSS definition
of "P.Section" for modern browsers could further be used to render the title
in a sans-serif face and slightly larger than the body text (using a
relative font size).
Are there other reasonable alternatives to <H3>Section Title</H3>? Having
to use <B></B> inside of <P></P> for backward compatibility is kind of
gross.
I suppose, directly allowing <H3></H3> specifically for section titles is
really a lot better than kludging up a [bad] approximation with
<P><B></B></P>. I retract my suggestion!
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Tags
|
| (...) Er... the slurpage stage whereupon the headers and body are transformed into HTML. Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Tags
|
| (...) Heh heh. Well, <H4> is typically the same size as the base font, but in bold, so I don't think anything but <H3> is needed, if that even is. Alternatives to <H3>x</H3> might be <P><B>x</B></P> or [maybe] better yet <P CLASS=y><B>x</B></P>...? (...) (26 years ago, 7-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
82 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
