To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.faqOpen lugnet.faq in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 FAQ / 207
206  |  208
Subject: 
Re: Progress so far, and a new header
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.faq
Date: 
Sat, 8 May 1999 01:00:22 GMT
Viewed: 
2153 times
  
In lugnet.faq, jsproat@geocities.com (Sproaticus) writes:
Sproaticus wrote:
How about just copying the "X-Ref:" header char for char?

The more I think about it, the more I think that this is exactly what I'm
oging to do.  The "Reference:" header would be a fully-formed URL, while the
"X-Ref:" header would tell the parser that it needs to be resolved into a
LUGNET article URL.

But don't copy the name 'X-Ref' if you copy the data -- that would be wicked
confusing because what you want is a reference to a prior article, and the
'X-Ref' header of NNTP articles *isn't* a reference to a prior article but
rather an ID of an article.

--Todd



Message has 2 Replies:
  (canceled)
 
  Re: Progress so far, and a new header
 
(...) I don't understand the difference -- is it just how the text is formatted, or does that number do some magic? Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.faq)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Progress so far, and a new header
 
(...) The more I think about it, the more I think that this is exactly what I'm oging to do. The "Reference:" header would be a fully-formed URL, while the "X-Ref:" header would tell the parser that it needs to be resolved into a LUGNET article URL. (...) (26 years ago, 7-May-99, to lugnet.faq)

82 Messages in This Thread:
























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR