Subject:
|
Re: Progress so far, and a new header
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.faq
|
Date:
|
Thu, 29 Apr 1999 10:38:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1941 times
|
| |
|
|
Jeremy:
> I want to be able to make context-specific notes on the FAQ items, which
> will not be exposed in the final output. I'm thinking of something like a
> Comment: header, which the parser will discard during processing.
Both the "Originator" and the "Comment" header entries make
sense.
Play well,
Jacob
------------------------------------------------------------
-- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk --
-- Web...: <URL:http://hugin.risoe.dk/JJ_Memorial/FAQ/> --
------------------------------------------------------------
Here's the edited list of header entries (please verify that
I haven't messed anything up):
Subject [the question]
Content-Language [ISO 639 language code]
Topic-Level [integer, 0 is beginner/easy/simple]
Revision [author, ISO date]
Location [comma-separated list of Lugnet relative
URI's]
Translated-From [ISO 639 language code]
Translator [translator, ISO date]
Originator [originator, ISO date]
Comment [will be ignored]
Include [relative (Unix) file name for another
FAQ entry - only header entries that
not already occur will be included]
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Progress so far, and a new header
|
| (...) Not to be anal-retentive, but you've forgotton the colons. Um, I'm not sure a pun was intended there. :-P Also, we should probably start keeping track of headers which may repeat, and those which are optional. Otherwise, it amtches my list. (...) (26 years ago, 29-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
| | | Re: Progress so far, and a new header
|
| (...) I'm really gonna hate myself for this ('cause I'm gonna haveta go back and find the relevant links) but there ought to be one more optional and repeating header for "Reference:". The data would be a URL to a LUGNET posting, Web site, whatever (...) (26 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Progress so far, and a new header
|
| Another header...? I want to be able to make context-specific notes on the FAQ items, which will not be exposed in the final output. I'm thinking of something like a Comment: header, which the parser will discard during processing. Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
82 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
