To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.faqOpen lugnet.faq in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 FAQ / 235
234  |  236
Subject: 
Re: Progress so far, and a new header
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.faq
Date: 
Thu, 13 May 1999 22:42:13 GMT
Viewed: 
1868 times
  
In lugnet.faq, jsproat@geocities.com (Sproaticus) writes:
Todd Lehman wrote:
But don't copy the name 'X-Ref' if you copy the data -- that would be
wicked confusing because what you want is a reference to a prior article,
and the 'X-Ref' header of NNTP articles *isn't* a reference to a prior
article but rather an ID of an article.

I don't understand the difference -- is it just how the text is formatted,
or does that number do some magic?

It's a semantic difference.

- 'References' refers to other articles (ancestors).

- 'Xref' is self-referential and refers both to itself and to any other
  copies of the same article if it has been crossposted.

So copying the 'Xref' header (and calling it the same thing) would be super
confusing if it were used for a different purpose (I gathered you wanted to
use it to refer to some article -- but it's only for an article to refer to
itself).

--Todd

p.s.  The 'Xref' header is also kind of odd in that it is an eXtension
header -- (so minus the 'X' it's simply 'ref') -- but it the 'X' in 'Xref'
really means "cross" in this odd case; 'Xref' means "cross-references."



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Progress so far, and a new header
 
(...) I don't understand the difference -- is it just how the text is formatted, or does that number do some magic? Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.faq)

82 Messages in This Thread:
























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR