Subject:
|
Ldraw.organization (was: License revision 1)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 15 Dec 2000 17:41:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1084 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Tim Courtney wrote:
> "Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@home.com> wrote in message
> > How does the phrase "Ad-hoc, self-selected totalitarian committee" sit with
> > you? ;)
>
> Hehe..
> Well given the nature of LCAD, its pretty difficult to select who is going to
> lead. But on the other side, having a panel of say 5-9 people who 'govern' LCAD
> might not be such a bad idea. What would happen if LDraw.org decided to collect
> donations for projects? For one, I am not comfortable handling (managing) large
> amounts of group money, so there creates a need for some sort of treasury, and
> there would need to be a governing body over that treasury.
I think it would be sufficient if we officially accept our somewhat
anarchic approach. Basically, we could have (appoint, elect) specific
officer positions, such as 'server admin', 'primary evangelist', 'parts
library administrator', 'innocent bystander'. The group of officers would
comprise the 'ldraw.org committee', who would have to responsibility of
keeping things going, and possibly deciding on issues. There wouldn't be
any ruling hierarchy[1] -- all officers would be on an equal level.
> I think that the pros outweigh the cons in
> creating some sort of panel, where none is the 'leader' but all can disucss and
> vote on issues which will benefit LCAD.
Yeah, what he said.
--
Steve
1) We could all select rank labels, if it makes us happy. I get 'Supreme
President and First Tiger'.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Ldraw.organization (was: License revision 1)
|
| (...) This is something that confuses me, sometimes you say ldraw.org and sometimes LCAD organization. I'd rather see things going in the direction of an "LCAD organization", I know that currently LDraw accounts for most of what we call LCAD but I (...) (24 years ago, 15-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: License revision 1
|
| "Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@home.com> wrote in message news:kuph3tcm65ren3n...4ax.com... (...) bit (...) panel (...) Hehe.. Well given the nature of LCAD, its pretty difficult to select who is going to lead. But on the other side, having a panel of (...) (24 years ago, 14-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
45 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
