Subject:
|
Re: Ldraw.organization (was: License revision 1)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 19 Dec 2000 20:26:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1168 times
|
| |
|
|
Tim Courtney wrote:
>
> "James Powell" <wx732@freenet.victoria.bc.ca> wrote in message
> news:G5Mt7q.3vr@lugnet.com...
> > Tim wrote:
> > > That's true. There should be a gradual shift in naming to 'LCAD • Organization'
> > > rather than LDraw.org, etc [1].
> >
> > No. Although I am -not- one of the CADheads, my vote would be to keep the
> > organization name/URL to be LDraw.org, because it honors James Jessman. Yes,
> > the focus of it _will_ change to LCAD programs (I'm one of the people who • would
> > like to see MLCad get more exposure on the Ldraw page, but hey...I started out
> > with Ldraw).
> >
> > James Powell
>
> Point taken. Any other opinions on this?
As a somewhat innocent bystander, I'd like to see it stay LDraw.org,
which is why I used the LDraw family of applications to refer to
programs which will ultimately derrive from the work James started.
--
Frank Filz
-----------------------------
Work: mailto:ffilz@us.ibm.com (business only please)
Home: mailto:ffilz@mindspring.com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Ldraw.organization (was: License revision 1)
|
| "James Powell" <wx732@freenet.victoria.bc.ca> wrote in message news:G5Mt7q.3vr@lugnet.com... (...) Organization' (...) would (...) Point taken. Any other opinions on this? -- Tim Courtney - tim@zacktron.com (URL) - Centralized LDraw Resources (URL) (...) (24 years ago, 15-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
45 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
