Subject:
|
Re: Ldraw.organization (was: License revision 1)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 15 Dec 2000 23:30:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1141 times
|
| |
|
|
"James Powell" <wx732@freenet.victoria.bc.ca> wrote in message
news:G5Mt7q.3vr@lugnet.com...
> Tim wrote:
> > That's true. There should be a gradual shift in naming to 'LCAD • Organization'
> > rather than LDraw.org, etc [1].
>
> No. Although I am -not- one of the CADheads, my vote would be to keep the
> organization name/URL to be LDraw.org, because it honors James Jessman. Yes,
> the focus of it _will_ change to LCAD programs (I'm one of the people who • would
> like to see MLCad get more exposure on the Ldraw page, but hey...I started out
> with Ldraw).
>
> James Powell
Point taken. Any other opinions on this?
--
Tim Courtney - tim@zacktron.com
http://www.ldraw.org - Centralized LDraw Resources
http://www.zacktron.com - Zacktron Alliance
ICQ: 23951114 - AIM: TimCourtne
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Ldraw.organization (was: License revision 1)
|
| (...) Well, I suppose nothing says that the URL and the title need match. If it's possible maybe try to dissociate the name Ldraw from the tool Ldraw? What I mean is newcomers to LCAD (like myself a few months ago) will want to go to that site as a (...) (24 years ago, 16-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Ldraw.organization (was: License revision 1)
|
| (...) No. Although I am -not- one of the CADheads, my vote would be to keep the organization name/URL to be LDraw.org, because it honors James Jessman. Yes, the focus of it _will_ change to LCAD programs (I'm one of the people who would like to see (...) (24 years ago, 15-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
45 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
