Subject:
|
Re: License - again
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 14 Dec 2000 13:01:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1379 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote:
>
> I agree completely. My ideal "contributor's agreement" would be to act
> like each contributed work existed as two independent entities, which had
> been independently created and had no connection with each other. One
> entitiy would be the author's complete property, and the other would be
> ldraw.org's property. Neither party would have any control over what the
> other party did with their file.
In other words, the contributors grant ldraw.org the rights to do
whatever they want with the parts. This should be in the parts
submission page, along with a button "I have read and accept the terms
of the agreement". It has nothing to do with the users license.
> > OTOH, I'm suprised no one has been approached by
> > Ritvik -- I imagine an LDRAW disk in a Megabloks set would
> > increase their market image.
>
> Heh-heh. Until we told everyone what the "L" stood for.
You can say that MLCad is "Megablocks and Lego CAD". :)
I remember someone saying that he has been approached by another
brand.
Leonardo
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: License - again
|
| (...) BTW, you're talking about the "contributor's agreement" here, not a user or distribution license. I agree completely. My ideal "contributor's agreement" would be to act like each contributed work existed as two independent entities, which had (...) (24 years ago, 13-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
55 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
