Subject:
|
Re: License - again
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 13 Dec 2000 02:37:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1300 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Paul Gyugyi writes:
> I like the artistic license, but not for a library of parts.
Oh, artistic is definitely not the best license to start from for parts. I don't
think it achieves anyone's goals in that direction. Artistic is well suited for
an application.
I'd have to review this thread's history to be aware of the desired goals for
the parts license...
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: License - again
|
| I like the artistic license, but not for a library of parts. The key issue to deal with in the LCAD library is "abandonment". The license must allow active LCAD people to maintain, modify, convert and distribute parts that people author. The (...) (24 years ago, 13-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
55 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
