Subject:
|
Re: License - again
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 4 Dec 2000 19:26:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1111 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote:
>
> The only problem is, this license is no use without an Authors/Contributors
> license to go with it.
I still couldn't understand what do you call "contributor's license".
The way I understand it is that when someone submits a part to the
voting process, they are allowing it to be redistributed under the
"redistribution license".
I don't see any need to have another license, the page that explains
how a person submits a part for voting could have a paragraph like "by
submiting a file for voting, you agree to allow it to be released under
the terms of the xyz license".
> And I think this is one is *too* brief.
Is there any point that is not covered by it ? I suggested to use it
as a starting point, I was expecting some feedback to add more
restrictions.
Leonardo
PS: Why don't we use LGPL ?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: License - again
|
| (...) Right, but that's an implied understanding, not an explicit agreement. Basically, there should be a "part submission" page on ldraw.org. One of the features of that page should be a link to a full contributor's agreement. Another necessary (...) (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: License - again
|
| The only problem is, this license is no use without an Authors/Contributors license to go with it. And I think this is one is *too* brief. Steve (...) (24 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
55 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
