To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 2259
2258  |  2260
Subject: 
Re: Idea: How starting to work for a unique Lego piece naming convention?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general, lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Wed, 7 Jul 1999 10:38:44 GMT
Viewed: 
120 times
  
Chris Dee wrote:

Would the plan be to include images for each part in each known colour?

For the decorated parts, at least, I would prefer that the image uses a real
life background colour rather than the default grey. As a reference for parts
sales, etc it would be confusing to say "this is the part, but actually it is
red" - thinking here of torsos mainly, which can look unrecognisable in an
alien colour. Indeed some parts demand this - eg. black castle parts with grey
decoration.

Also, complex decorated parts (heads, torsos) could benefit from being rendered
at greater than 100% (with some annotation?)

Chris

Why not add some new meta-commands?
Either:
0 DEAFULTS COLOUR=15 ZOOM=150 (or 1.5)
Or:
0 DEFAULT COLOUR 15
0 DEFAULT ZOOM 1.5
...
In fact, parts of the database could be hosted in the parts' .DAT files

(to be continued in my posting subjected "Parts Database...")



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Idea: How starting to work for a unique Lego piece naming convention?
 
(...) Would the plan be to include images for each part in each known colour? For the decorated parts, at least, I would prefer that the image uses a real life background colour rather than the default grey. As a reference for parts sales, etc it (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.general)

80 Messages in This Thread:































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR