| |
This seems like it is reaching critical mass (a good thing) and perhaps at
this point a dedicated newsgroup should be created for this (i.e., efforts
to standardize parts nomenclature).
How does
lugnet.db.brictionary
sound?
I wouldn't quite put it beneath lugnet.db.inv because inventories are just
one possible application of parts names.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Newsgroup for this (was Re: The Bricktionary project)
|
| (...) Sounds good. Right place in the hierarchy. (...) And it's not actually part names, but a parts identification database, right? Having standard/prefered names is good, but it's the pictures (and maybe schematics) that actually identify the (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: The Bricktionary project (Was: Idea: How starting ... Lego piece naming convention?)
|
| (...) Oops -- I think there has been a major misunderstanding; that's not what I meant at all. When I wrote: TSL> As they say in Canada, Minnesota, and Maine, "O-ya, it's been parta da TSL> plan since day one." :-) Lots of little prototypes and (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.general)
|
80 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Database
|
|
|
|
|
|
