To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.suggestionsOpen lugnet.admin.suggestions in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / Suggestions / 245
244  |  246
Subject: 
Re: Block user X from replying to a message by user Y
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.suggestions
Date: 
Fri, 10 May 2002 22:49:59 GMT
Viewed: 
2994 times
  
LUGNET Admin wrote:
> So far, it goes something like this:
> 
> -----------
> New!  LUGNET "Bickering Prevention" Policy
> 
> When I catch someone at useless bickering, or flaming, or having off-topic
> arguments in on-topic groups, or generating purely hostile noise that's a
> nusiance to the community, I will take action.
> 
> The person(s) involved will receive a time-out or chill-out period during
> which I hope they can calm down, "let it go," or take their argument into
> e-mail, or to r.t.l.
> 
> This period would last at least 1 day, maybe 3, but probably not more.
> 
> Now, before Scott asks me:  ;-)
> No, I won't write super-specific rules. or attempt to establish a "line" for
> those who wish to push it. There's no clear way to define such things, so
> it'll be based on common sense. and, I suppose,  my own opinion and judgement.
> 
> That means there'll be times when I'll miss some fight or another and maybe
> it seems "unfair" to certain people. But... (sorry) that's just too bad. The
> needs of the many outweigh those of the few (who're bickering ones, at
> that), and I side with those visitors who come here only read the groups for
> relevant -content. And I don't see how a "laws and policing" system could work.

I think that sounds good. I don't think you'll miss anything significant
since what is a concern is things which start to brew out of control,
and those get noticed (and if you have a semi-formal policy, you'll get
helpful e-mails if you aren't noticing). The situation where someone
says something which gets a little under someone's skin, and they make a
snippy remark, and then the original poster apologizes or just keeps
their trap shut, and the whole thing dies, those are mostly OK.

I just want to add that I for one am really pleased that the Lugnet
administration is becoming visible and active again. It may take a while
for that to permeate to all aspects of Lugnet, but I think Lugnet is
going to recover some of it's luster as various issues (technical and
social) get addressed.

Frank



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Block user X from replying to a message by user Y
 
(...) In other words, Suz don't worry, we'll come tell you Mommy. ;) All joking aside, this is the real reason I'm replying... (...) I hate to "me too," post, but Frank, you said it so well and I feel the need to show agreement. I think we generally (...) (24 years ago, 11-May-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
  Re: Block user X from replying to a message by user Y
 
(...) I should specify that when I said "time out" I mean shutting off their posting privelages temporarily. Also, I'm careful to use the word 'bickering' over 'arguing' because arguments can be constructive and provide a variety of views on an (...) (24 years ago, 11-May-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Block user X from replying to a message by user Y
 
(...) That's not a bad idea, and I appreciate all suggestions, but I don't think it's really in LUGNET's 'style'. It seems a bit too personalized and restrictive for us. There's too much potential for it to cut off good conversation, be confusing on (...) (24 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)

51 Messages in This Thread:


















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR