| |
Steve Bliss wrote:
>
> On Thu, 8 Jul 1999 17:03:26 GMT, "Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > This seems like it is reaching critical mass (a good thing) and perhaps at
> > this point a dedicated newsgroup should be created for this (i.e., efforts
> > to standardize parts nomenclature).
> >
> > How does
> >
> > lugnet.db.brictionary
> >
> > sound?
>
> Sounds good. Right place in the hierarchy.
>
> > I wouldn't quite put it beneath lugnet.db.inv because inventories are just
> > one possible application of parts names.
>
> And it's not actually part names, but a parts identification database,
> right? Having standard/prefered names is good, but it's the pictures (and
> maybe schematics) that actually identify the part.
Not to overwhelm kl.net, but if a piece can be indentified in an old manual
that has been scanned maybe a DB field could mention that. Doesn't have to
be a direct link, but it might be a good common reference point.
Mark
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Newsgroup for this (was Re: The Bricktionary project)
|
| (...) Sounds good. Right place in the hierarchy. (...) And it's not actually part names, but a parts identification database, right? Having standard/prefered names is good, but it's the pictures (and maybe schematics) that actually identify the (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
80 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Database
|
|
|
|
|
|
