 | | Re: LUGNET needs a Lounge
|
|
(...) I'm "all in" :-d (...) That really does sound like fun. Alas, it won't be. But you're coming to Brickworld, yes? And bring along (by the ear, if you have to) Koudys, too! (Chris in tow is a given) (...) What's the drinking age in TGWN? Ross (...) (19 years ago, 23-Oct-07, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET needs a Lounge
|
|
(...) It's fun there. Clever riffing = good times, is what I always say. (...) Listen, I fully disclosed... I can't help it if you don't read your mail or hate the TRUTH. JOHN (19 years ago, 23-Oct-07, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET needs a Lounge
|
|
(...) First round of virtual drinks are on me... Pulls out my invisible Gold Card, who's up for shots???? Hey John, why dont you and Ross pack up the train display and come join as at the Hobby Show the first weekend of November??? Come on, you know (...) (19 years ago, 23-Oct-07, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET needs a Lounge
|
|
(...) Gee John, if that's your real name. Where did you get that idea? Tell THE TRUTH and don't HATE ME. Seriously: John's rampant conceptual pilfering notwithstanding, I think that this would be a nice idea to try out, so I second the motion if (...) (19 years ago, 23-Oct-07, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET needs a Lounge
|
|
(...) The name "lounge" for an ot forum is not my idea, mind you. But I disagree. I like the way off-topic works; I just think an o-t.lounge might be in order. The OTL. I'd hang there, just like the Friends who hung out in Central Perk (how was that (...) (19 years ago, 23-Oct-07, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET needs a Lounge
|
|
(...) Wow, that is a great name! This would've been a great alternative to the .off-topic name, back in the beginning... wish we'd thought of it then! --Todd (19 years ago, 23-Oct-07, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | LUGNET needs a Lounge
|
|
.fun/.pun are for FUs when threads swerve OT; .debate has contentious connotations. A lounge would provide true OT living, where the pithy and the clever could congregate and gentle smack would be allowed-- like an .rtl, without all of the (...) (19 years ago, 23-Oct-07, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | New Lugnet member profile name problem
|
|
This summer I joined Lugnet. In my profile ((URL) my name appears repeated many times, as if my full name were entered for both my first and last names (it is not inconceivable I did this by accident myself). For example, where "John Smith" appears (...) (19 years ago, 24-Aug-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Long delay between email post and authentication request
|
|
@all, I have dug into the issue a bit more, and having spent the last 2 hours or so working through the mail queues, I have found that the mail gateway for LUGNET news is currently being drowned in spam to invalid addresses. The active queue is now (...) (19 years ago, 23-Aug-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Long delay between email post and authentication request
|
|
(...) I have *no* problems with getting the initial "Message awaiting authentication" mail, it has (almost) always arrived within a minute. The problem is that if I auth by replying to the email, it will take an enormous amount of time before the (...) (19 years ago, 23-Aug-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Long delay between email post and authentication request
|
|
(...) @all, I have identified a substantial increase of Spam to the mail-gateway, which basically resulted in an "overfull" queue of deferred bounces (the mail gateway does send a response to the original sender if for any reasons it cannot accept a (...) (19 years ago, 23-Aug-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Long delay between email post and authentication request
|
|
(...) Ummm. Authentication response sent at 07:20 Am I now going to have to wait another 5 and a quarter hours for this to actually appear on the list? (19 years ago, 23-Aug-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Long delay between email post and authentication request
|
|
(...) Experiencing the same thing. Email reply posted 22:53 Authentication request received 04:11 (19 years ago, 23-Aug-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Bug in current version of LDList
|
|
I first replied almost three hours ago, but for some reason e-mail authentication never got this posted. I had to send it again and authenticate on the web page to get the message to appear?? FUT: lugnet.admin.general (...) (19 years ago, 22-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET aircraft group?
|
|
(...) This would be sweet. I've got a couple different civilian aircraft and that would be a great place to post them. -Dave (19 years ago, 10-Aug-07, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: How many times will this post appear?
|
|
(...) Is it when you fup-to less than you originally post? Tim (19 years ago, 10-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: How many times will this post appear?
|
|
(...) Does this mean that you an Al may have found some of the problem? Tim (19 years ago, 10-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET aircraft group?
|
|
Sure, why not? Magnus (19 years ago, 6-Aug-07, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET aircraft group?
|
|
(...) I'd like to see this group too (lugnet.build.aircraft would be my preferred location). I tend to build civilian aircraft and would like somewhere neat to post them. Tim (19 years ago, 1-Aug-07, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | LUGNET aircraft group?
|
|
This newsgroup (lugnet.build.military) is great for posting military aircraft, such as (URL) Ralph Savelsberg's F-117A and Su-27>. But there's really no suitable place for civilian aircraft. I know that LUGNET has been in a pretty static state for a (...) (19 years ago, 31-Jul-07, to lugnet.build.military, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: My fault
|
|
(...) This might not be what you want to hear, but you may be able to find Oxford sets on the shelves in Korea. Oxford is a remarkably high quality clone brand 100% compatible with LEGO, Mega Bloks, and the like, and it includes a range of unusual (...) (19 years ago, 11-Jul-07, to lugnet.loc.kr, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My fault
|
|
Hello there! I'm going to Seoul, Korea in a few months for business, and was wondering if any one knew 'ANYTHING' about Lego in Korea... Do major department stores stock newer sets...are the prices similar?!? Is there any Korean-Canadians out there (...) (19 years ago, 11-Jul-07, to lugnet.loc.kr, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with traffic page
|
|
(...) Hi Tim, I have yet to figure out what went wrong - haven't seen this happening in a loooong time. Thanks for pointing me to this issue, Jerry (19 years ago, 3-Jul-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Problem with traffic page
|
|
When I just looked, the traffic page was showing one post for the last 60 mins, quite a few for the last 24 hours, but none for the last 7 days. Tim (19 years ago, 3-Jul-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Problem Posting
|
|
Brian Williams has contacted me as he is having problems posting. I'm a member and post from the web while logged on so I'm not really sure of the correct procedure. Can anyone help him? (...) Tim (19 years ago, 28-Jun-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Fibblesnork
|
|
(...) Also the backgrounds: (URL) have been the official URLs of those resources since 1998. (...) AFAIK, the FLG was never at that URL... (...) ...but there may have been a small links page there at one point. Wow, what a trip down memory lane! The (...) (19 years ago, 18-Jun-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Fibblesnork
|
|
(...) Here's the link where the guide is living now: (URL) know (URL) used to link to *somewhere*, although I'm not sure if it linked directly to the guide or to a more central 'fibblesnork' page. DaveE (19 years ago, 18-Jun-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Fibblesnork
|
|
(...) Hi René, in english to let others understand what's going on... I don't understand what the design of the guide frontpage has to do with the fibblesnork guide. I don't think that the FG will be revisid itself as it's a stand-alone site for (...) (19 years ago, 18-Jun-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Fibblesnork
|
|
(...) Hi Ronald, Die Guide-Frontpage muss noch überarbeitet werden, dann... ;-) Gruß, Rene (19 years ago, 16-Jun-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Getting Error on Lugnet Main Page
|
|
(...) It actually is the cause of the error, as the quotes are not correctly escaped by one of the scripts - I'd've fixed it already but I'm on a business trip currently. I think the workaround does the trick for now, and a permanent fix will be put (...) (19 years ago, 14-Jun-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: How much of LUGNET is indexed by Google?
|
|
Actually, with the old server I think a lot of LUGNET's pages were set to "NOINDEX" due to server load concerns. When René and I took over, we opened up basically everything including images for indexing by search engines, in the first couple of (...) (19 years ago, 14-Jun-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Getting Error on Lugnet Main Page
|
|
(...) Ben has quotes in his username (Reinhard "Ben" Beneke), this may be related. ROSCO (19 years ago, 13-Jun-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Getting Error on Lugnet Main Page
|
|
(...) Looks like there's a bug in the code that's generating the sidebar. As a temporary fix (until the underlying problem is repaired), I'm running an automatic "fixer" once a minute that should repair the autogenerated code. So, the problem may (...) (19 years ago, 13-Jun-07, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Fibblesnork
|
|
(...) Hi! Apart from the actual script error on the frontpage, it seems to be revised now for months but I still do not find the Fibblesnork Guide. Have I missed another statement about this fantastic page? Bye Ronald (19 years ago, 13-Jun-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: How much of LUGNET is indexed by Google?
|
|
(...) And let's face it the search function on lugnet ain't in the same league as google's. Tim (19 years ago, 13-Jun-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: How much of LUGNET is indexed by Google?
|
|
(...) All of it, I'd hope. (...) I think it's a good thing - Google's a great way of findnig information, and there's a lot of useful information in various posts on LUGNET. Why wouldn't we want it to be findable? Dan (19 years ago, 13-Jun-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | How much of LUGNET is indexed by Google?
|
|
How much of LUGNET is indexed by Google? I have recently been trying to find out how and where my name shows up on Google's search engine. I was surprised to LUGNET posts I had made showing up. Are individual posts to LUGNET all indexed by Google? (...) (19 years ago, 13-Jun-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Brickwise - its not very helpful if it is not maintained.
|
|
When was the last time sombody actually updated this "resource"? Its not very helpful when it is years out of sync. Maybe it should just be taken down? Just my $0.02. -Dnesbit (19 years ago, 7-Jun-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Hmmmm....
|
|
Can't help but notice the distinct lack of info on the rtlToronto sidebar. That seems a tad unusual, was there a technical glitch somewhere? ROSCO (19 years ago, 6-Jun-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Server outages May 5-6, 2007
|
|
Hi all, just a quick note on what was up yesterday and today w/regard to LUGNET being temporarily offline: Our main server developed a mainboard and CPU fault which took the system down several times until we realized that it really was a hardware (...) (19 years ago, 6-May-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: When posting, from field indicates a no loonger valid email address - How to change?
|
|
(...) See three posts ago ;) (URL) (19 years ago, 20-Mar-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | When posting, from field indicates a no loonger valid email address - How to change?
|
|
LUGNET Admin, How does one change the From Field in the posts to the forums. Mine reports the following: Todd Thuma <thumat@gactr.=ihate...m=uga.edu> This is not longer valid nor is it in my profile. How does one change this or is this a code issue (...) (19 years ago, 20-Mar-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickWorld 2007 - who's getting paid?
|
|
(...) Though I'm no expert at such things, I suspect that lugnet.events is the appropriate place: lugnet.events– Organized community events, festivals, competitions, tournaments, shows, etc.: announcements, ideas, collaboration, planning, (...) (19 years ago, 15-Mar-07, to lugnet.events.brickworld, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Help with old address
|
|
Hi Patty, Ross, (...) Leg Godt! René (19 years ago, 14-Mar-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Help with old address
|
|
(...) Hi Patty, You have to enter your correct email information in the posting setup screen here: (URL) you submit that, I think it has to be checked and approved before it goes into effect. Hope this helps ROSCO (19 years ago, 12-Mar-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Help with old address
|
|
My work address is associated some how with this web site I tried stripping it out of my profile. It does not appear there anymore. I still get notifications at work that I sent emails etc. as a copy. Now my work has started blocking LUGNET pages (...) (19 years ago, 12-Mar-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Updated, enhanced LDraw shortcut images in FTX (Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX)
|
|
(...) Hi Thomas, we're on it, thanks for pointing out! Leg Godt! Rene (19 years ago, 8-Mar-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: The front page hates German
|
|
(...) I'm sure the good members of lugnet can deal with some downtime sometime to help our accented-alphabet members :D Tim (19 years ago, 8-Mar-07, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The front page hates German
|
|
(...) Hi Tim, I have a few problems with the character encoding, I would like to switch from ISO-8859 to UTF-8 which isn't easy going while normal operation :-/ -René (19 years ago, 8-Mar-07, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The front page hates German
|
|
(...) and not only with the "ö" but also with the inverted " ' " used in this post title : (URL) Didier (19 years ago, 7-Mar-07, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | The front page hates German
|
|
Hi Rene, The highlights list on the front page seems to hate German (or at least umlauts) and has replaced the umlauted ö in the "Steamship Möwe" with a ? making it "M?we" Tim (19 years ago, 6-Mar-07, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Updated, enhanced LDraw shortcut images in FTX (Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX)
|
|
(...) Not all of these seem to work. . . TWS Garrison (19 years ago, 3-Mar-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
(...) Thank you, Rene, for issuing a formal statement about the resolution of this incident, and to Dave for filling in some details. In retrospect, this was the missing link which publicly clarifies the official stance on this issue. It is good to (...) (19 years ago, 21-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
(...) Thank you for clarifying your position Rene. I also think it's worth clarifying my statement above. As a curator at Lugnet, I will try my best to act responsibly, and I cannot envisage any set of circumstances that would cause me to ever (...) (19 years ago, 21-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general) !
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
(...) Nothing so dramatic; and I've seen (URL) Rene's recent post>, so that's settled. By "core issue" I was referring to a perception of potential future admin malfeasance. While the immediate flurry has been beaten to death, I remain unconvinced (...) (19 years ago, 20-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
(...) So, you'd like to see a public reprimand from Rene, and/or a public apology from Ross? I think at this point, it's clear that: - What Ross did was not acceptable (in my book certainly, and I assume in Rene's as well). - There was (...) (19 years ago, 20-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
This is directed to all people who would like to see sanctions against Ross. (...) I am so sorry that I haven't received Ross' and Eric's emails regarding this matter (both sent before Bob's posting), because if I would have received one of them or (...) (19 years ago, 20-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
(...) same answers as John -mark (19 years ago, 20-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
(...) I strongly agree with Kelly's response above. The role of administrator is a priveledge that should be bestowed upon trustworthy and honorable people. The priveledge should be revoked if used outside of the purvue of responsible administrative (...) (19 years ago, 20-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
(...) Unfortunately, I believe you are correct. (...) I don't know his motives any better than I assume you do, but it seems to me that he moved it to .debate in order to marginalize my attempts to steer this discussion back toward the central issue (...) (19 years ago, 20-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Small issue with homepage & Firefox
|
|
(...) Hi Ross, that is s.th. I would adjust. First it was interesting to know whether the effect shows up right in IE7 basically. -Rene (19 years ago, 20-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Small issue with homepage & Firefox
|
|
(...) Because (in FF) the size of the link reduces when you mouse over, it creates a very strange effect when the mouse is near the border between 2 adjacent links - it alternates between one link and the other. ROSCO (19 years ago, 20-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Small issue with homepage & Firefox
|
|
(...) That was fast, just got a screenshot via email. IE7 does show them, that's good for now. Well, should I make the change to a more clear source code? -Rene (19 years ago, 20-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Small issue with homepage & Firefox
|
|
(...) Hi Geoffrey (and other IE7 users), here is a test site: (URL) With IE6, there should not be a yellow preview box when moving the mouse over any of the Top Stories links. With FF, there should be a yellow preview box (although it will be (...) (19 years ago, 20-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Small issue with homepage & Firefox
|
|
"Rene Hoffmeister" <rene@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:JDqDqF.A0I@lugnet.com... (...) I don't know about "elements other than just <a>" but if I go and hover over the LUGNET top stories here on my IE7 client, that it seems to remove the last (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
"Chris Phillips" <drvegetable@comcast.net> wrote in message news:JDqEKz.JzF@lugnet.com... (...) Chris ... I think you are trying to do little more than argue an argument to it's unarguable end. That is why Ross Crawford redirected it to .debate (...) (19 years ago, 20-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
(...) No. The admins will determine if I crossed any line, and take action as necessary. (...) Firstly, that has nothing to do with the point I was making about wanting ALL admins to be "in the loop" when someone "contacts admin". And secondly, the (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
(...) A point which is still apparently lost on you? (...) So you sent e-mail to the admins, and then in the absence of a response you assumed that you had administrative approval to alter somebody else's content? No problem. Sure. (...) Under the (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Small issue with homepage & Firefox
|
|
(...) I have to admit that I haven't installed IE7 yet, does anybody know whether IE7 knows the :hover pseudo also for other elements than just <a>? If yes, I indeed would change the code, because IE6- users wouldn't lose any significant (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Small issue with homepage & Firefox
|
|
(...) Ah good old IE! Maybe we should penalise people who use IE by using the correct code?????? (Yes, I am kidding!!!!) ROSCO (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
(...) Well, that's even worse, and should be fixed. (...) No, that's a different point entirely. (...) I don't think anyone had a problem with Dave reverting the pics, do you? (...) At least (URL) one person did>, and preferred to email the admins (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Small issue with homepage & Firefox
|
|
(...) Hi Ross, to be honest, the way I wrote the source code isn't the cleanest way. Example: <div class='box_top box_topcol_x'> <a class='top_link' href='(URL)Green Quad <span> <img src='(URL) alt='' /> Hey all, check out my (URL) Green Quad, now (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Small issue with homepage & Firefox
|
|
(...) Yeah I was pretty sure it was correct behaviour, but it could be a little confusing/annoying. I guess there's no easy way to work around it? ROSCO (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
(...) It seems that NONE of the admins received your e-mail, because the implication I've been reading is that NONE of them would have told you to go ahead. But the point is, you shouldn't need the admins to tell you when you are crossing that line, (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Small issue with homepage & Firefox
|
|
(...) Hi Ross, this is correct behaviour, because the whole link is still active. The link consists of the subject in the blue Top Stories Box AND the text in the yellow box (in FF clarified by the dotted line). Click on any place on the site to (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Small issue with homepage & Firefox
|
|
When using Firefox, if I middle-click one of the top stories to open in a new tab, the description popup stays displayed, and mousing over the other topics displays their popups behind it. Opera doesn't seem to have this problem, but I haven't tried (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
(...) No, it bothers me because (as happened in this case) an email to the Lugnet admins does not reach ALL Lugnet admins, and one of the admins that was "out of the loop" reverted my changes. While not a problem in this case, I can see a potential (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Rene Hoffmeister wrote: - snip - (...) Rene, I understand your reluctance to pursue administrative repurcussions in this latest flare-up. Unfortunately, perception of administrative bias is as damaging as actual bias. A lack (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
(...) Hi Chris, thank you very much for your thoughts. Be sure I've given this whole issue careful consideration. But as far as I can see, there was a lot of healthy discussion and I'm pretty sure some people will rethink their futur behaviour. I (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
(...) Definitely not. I'm deeply disturbed by the actions of Rosco (*and* others). It looks like lugnet is falling apart, and he's helping. I was also astonished by the lack of administrator reaction to Rosco's actions. Even if we only see half a (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
(...) Nope. (...) Yep. JOHN (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
(...) Am I the only one who is bothered by the total anarchy on display here? A LUGNET curator abuses his priviledges in order to harass another member, and the official response is "no harm done?" Ross, you owe Eric an apology, public and sincere. (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general) !!
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet home page broken
|
|
(...) Thanks Dan! I guess it was broken again after 15 minutes at the latest and I was asleep :-( Sorry, my fault! I've fixed it; it was, of course, a quoting problem and shouldn't happen again. Leg Godt! Rene (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet home page broken
|
|
(...) Fixed for now, but the underlying problem is still there, and will probably break the page again every hour until we can fix it. Dan (19 years ago, 18-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet home page broken
|
|
(...) Sounds like an unescaped quote issue. I'm getting the same problem. - Kelly (19 years ago, 18-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | lugnet home page broken
|
|
i'm getting an error message. i'm using IE An internal server error occurred: syntax error at data_topstories.inc.pl line 13, near "on Wed, 14 Feb 2007 in lugnet.space)</span>...</div><div class='box_top box_topcol_x'><a class='top_link' (...) (19 years ago, 18-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf and Lugnet front page?
|
|
(...) Good point. One site's down-time shouldn't have to interfere with another. I like the new Lugnet front page, incidentally. Jim (19 years ago, 18-Feb-07, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf and Lugnet front page?
|
|
(...) However there probably still should be more error checking in the random gallery box code ;) ROSCO (19 years ago, 18-Feb-07, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf and Lugnet front page?
|
|
(...) It's back! Jim (19 years ago, 18-Feb-07, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf and Lugnet front page?
|
|
(...) Hmm, I see the same problems. I cannot access Brickshelf galleries or pages, but (URL) deep links> still seem to work. Jim (19 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Brickshelf and Lugnet front page?
|
|
Is anyone else getting a brickshelf.com (and maj.com)? Also, the stories seem to have disappeared from the main Lugnet page, this seems to be caused be the server error at brickshelf, causing an abort error in the "recent gallery" box. ROSCO (19 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
Rene, Can you please choose to murfle (URL) The embedded graphic contains language that can be considered profane and is risque in terms of LUGNET's family friendliness. Somehow the site does not read the text contained in images. ;-) Kevin, while I (...) (19 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.admin.general) !
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
(...) Note that until then, the traffic link is still on every other page besides the main page. ROSCO (19 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Timothy Gould wrote: <snip> (...) That wasn't my conscious intent at the beginning, but thinking about it now--Others were provoking him. You're right--they weren't better than him. Sorry if the truth hurts, but there the (...) (19 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
(...) Sorry. I meant to say Al. Tim (19 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
(...) To be clear, I was never threatened with legal action. A DMCA notification was served against Northstar (host of jlug.net) regarding pictures linked from jlug.net (but hosted by maj.com). It was Northstar that was obliged to remove the link, (...) (19 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
(...) -snip- (...) My regrets sir, I apologize. Eric Sophie (19 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
(...) Allister: Please do not call Eric an idiot. Thank you. Eric: Are you in earnest with the statement above? Because there's a way for ME to protect LUGNET and me from such a hassle, but I doubt this would be what you want. Please be very (...) (19 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general) !
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
(...) I'm sorry but I still feel that your choice to single out Eric as being "better than this" was implying that others weren't. Eric's actions lately imply that he is in no way better than this. This latest incident was started by Eric (off (...) (19 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
(...) I had a whole beautiful (if I do so say myself) exposition here but somehow the page refreshed and it all went 'bye bye'! So I start again, and I've noticed from past experiences, that the second time through is never as good as the first one. (...) (19 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
