To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 47369
47368  |  47370
Subject: 
Re: Jake did good Thanks!!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Thu, 6 May 2004 16:51:07 GMT
Viewed: 
2560 times
  
   We can all keep ranting about how we don’t like it or we can realize the decision has been made and move on.

Actually, I’m not being that magnanamous. I don’t like the color change and if ranting or anything else might get it reversed I will rant.

My point was rather that I can’t understand why people are questioning that TLC’s reasons as given by Jake are anything but the true reasons. And I certainly don’t approve of us giving Jake a harder time than we already do.

I have every reason to think that Jake’s unique position at TLC as an advocate for the serious LEGO builder (I personally dislike the term AFOL) is as much due to Jake working to get the company to create the position as to being selected for the job. It’s not a matter of not “shooting the messenger” but more of not shooting our best and only friend while he’s trying to help us.

-Ted



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: Jake did good Thanks!!
 
(...) Well, there are several levels of truth to be considered in this context. 1. The information is "true" insofar as it accurately reflects the motivations and goals of TLG 2. The information is "true" insofar as it is "truly" the information (...) (20 years ago, 6-May-04, to lugnet.general)
  Re: Jake did good Thanks!!
 
(...) Yep. If I thought ranting and carrying on would increase our influence in the company rather than diminish it, or would be likely to reverse the change, I'd be out there ranting too. (...) Agreed. Jake started out as in charge of some aspects (...) (20 years ago, 6-May-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
  Re: Jake did good Thanks!!
 
Hello! (...) You are right, this term is highly questionable. I like building with LEGO bricks and collecting LEGO sets. But I am not a "fan of LEGO" because - following TLC's corporate identity statement on www.lego.com - "it is not possible to (...) (20 years ago, 6-May-04, to lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Jake did good Thanks!!
 
(...) I agree whole-heartedly. I have my issues with the company's direction and some of the decisions they make. But the fact is, I'm not sitting in their meetings and I don't have the information they have. We can all keep ranting about how we (...) (20 years ago, 6-May-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)

52 Messages in This Thread:


























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR