Subject:
|
Re: Jake did good?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.color
|
Date:
|
Mon, 10 May 2004 05:19:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2757 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.color, Tim Courtney wrote:
> In lugnet.color, Johannes Koehler wrote:
> > Ben did not necessarily express an opinion focused towards the colour issue. So
> > I think posting this in .general is also appropriate.
>
> If you read the text of Ben's post, I don't see how it can be interpreted as
> anything *but* a continued commentary on the issue of the color change.
>
> FUT set back to lugnet.color.
I agree with Tim, and even if the post was broadly about the LEGO company and
Ben's feelings about that rather than mostly about color, it still doesn't
belong in .general... that sort of thing belongs in the .lego hierarchy
somewhere.
And arguing about where a thread belongs tends not to belong in .general either!
That verges over into the .admin area...
Please note: We just went through a patch where .general was growing by leaps
and bounds (to the point where LUGNET, the server, was caving under the load)
and arguably mostly with posts that didn't really belong in .general... Todd's
now created a .color group to help focus discussion better. (at the behind the
scenes urging of some of us) It may be a bit bumpy at first while we all try to
internalise what belongs there and what doesn't so please bear with it if you
would... in the end it will make things run much more smoothly if you steer
stuff to the right place yourself without being reminded, or go along with
steering when it's being done by folks such as Todd, Tim, Frank or myself.
++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Jake did good?
|
| (...) If you read the text of Ben's post, I don't see how it can be interpreted as anything *but* a continued commentary on the issue of the color change. FUT set back to lugnet.color. -Tim (20 years ago, 9-May-04, to lugnet.color)
|
52 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
