Subject:
|
Re: My humble opinion about LDraw animation
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Mon, 22 Aug 2005 20:07:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2377 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Stefan Gustavson wrote:
> The LDraw file format, which is at the heart of it all,
> is a static scene description language. I think we should
> start attacking the problem there, and I would suggest
> moving on to a more modern (but of course compatible)
> file format, perhaps based on XML which has proven itself
> in a large number of applications, quite a few of them
> related to computer graphics.
XML has poor human-readibility.
The text format should be accepted before it has a GUI front-end, and that can
be only if it's readeable enough.
Anyway, who writes the interpreter decides the format.
Considerations,
Damien
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: My humble opinion about LDraw animation
|
| (...) Right. When free software exists and is good enough to outperform commercial solutions in some applications, it will of course be used. The extremely successful combination Apache/PHP springs to mind - lots of web sites who could easily afford (...) (19 years ago, 22-Aug-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
61 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
