Subject:
|
Re: My humble opinion about LDraw animation
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Mon, 22 Aug 2005 20:20:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2391 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Damien Guichard wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Stefan Gustavson wrote:
> > The LDraw file format, which is at the heart of it all,
> > is a static scene description language. I think we should
> > start attacking the problem there, and I would suggest
> > moving on to a more modern (but of course compatible)
> > file format, perhaps based on XML which has proven itself
> > in a large number of applications, quite a few of them
> > related to computer graphics.
>
> XML has poor human-readibility.
> The text format should be accepted before it has a GUI front-end, and that can
> be only if it's readeable enough.
> Anyway, who writes the interpreter decides the format.
>
> Considerations,
>
> Damien
Poor XML has poor human-readibility. XML in general is fine.
<part>
<no>
13
</no>
<pos>
10,12, 15
</pos>
</part>
is quite readable.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: My humble opinion about LDraw animation
|
| (...) XML has poor human-readibility. The text format should be accepted before it has a GUI front-end, and that can be only if it's readeable enough. Anyway, who writes the interpreter decides the format. Considerations, Damien (19 years ago, 22-Aug-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
61 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
