Subject:
|
Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Thu, 15 Apr 2004 18:55:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1344 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Orion Pobursky wrote:
> Don't forget LDDP's generator (soon to be a plugin again).
Cool! I actually like the plugin idea even better than open source
(although the two ideas do work together well). In my LDRAW fantasy
world (which is probably based on Karim's Artemis paper) all the
really nifty functionality is provided by plugins that can be shared
by ALL the Ldraw programs.
> LDDP also supports the processing of code through LSynth.
Is that via a plugin wrapper? If not, is there any chance you could
convert it to use a plugin wrapper so we can all share it?
Don
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
| (...) Yes, I think we can go in that direction. It would certainly make updating errors a lot simpler. And since most of LDDP's functions manipulate the text in some way it's easily doable. (...) No, but there is hope. See above -Orion (20 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
| (...) Don't forget LDDP's generator (soon to be a plugin again). It's based on Fredrik Glockner's emacs code and supports: 73590B.DAT Hose Flexible 8.5L with Tabs (750.dat for endpoints) 73590A.DAT Hose Flexible 8.5L without Tabs (752.dat for (...) (20 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
