Subject:
|
Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Fri, 16 Apr 2004 16:32:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1404 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
> lsynthcp will always be a seperate program so that other programs
> can use it as a library sort of thing, like Lars taught me about L3P.
Ah, that's good to hear.
> > Someone mentioned getopt and everyone seemed to like it but me, because
> > I'd already started working with the original meta-command syntax.
> > Did that getopt syntax stuff ever go anywhere, or was that just a red
> > herring?
>
> I don't like the getopt format because it is so different than
> standard issue meta-commands.
Waitaminute!! That's what I said a year ago, but you appeared to
get suckered in by the getopt proposal. Oh well.
> > Anyhow, I suppose I could just check the changes into CVS and see if
> > anyone notices. ;^)
>
> Well, I have to get hooked in and put in a few of my changes as well.
Short instructions:
http://www.netbeans.org/kb/articles/sourceforge.html
Medium instructions:
http://delphree.clexpert.com/pages/sf_howto.htm
Long instructions:
http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=766&group_id=1
> Another thing I'd like to do is stop hard coding constraints and
> synthesis parts into LSynth (at least for band synthesis), and move
> those controls externally to a file.
>
> Defining part/radius/orientation for bands should be easy. Defining
> cross sections and end parts for hoses should be easy too.
You should consider using ldraw.ini for this on Windows. Then it can
use the portable version of getprivateprofilestring(). Or were you
thinking of passing a config filename to lsynthcp on the command line,
or maybe just a DAT file with a bunch of meta commands? ldconfig.ldr?
Don
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
| (...) Well, I actually want to take this kind of thing to the LSC for review. (...) I had not made it this far. I had just made it to the concept phase. There are a few things that control hose synthesis; hose type, hose segment part type, segment (...) (20 years ago, 16-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
| In lugnet.cad, Don Heyse wrote: <snip> (...) a library sort of thing, like Lars taught me about L3P. (...) I don't like the getopt format because it is so different than standard issue meta-commands. (...) Well, I have to get hooked in and put in a (...) (20 years ago, 16-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
