 | | Re: How to remove a part
|
|
(...) Just found this out: Take a flat blade screwdriver and slip the blade under the the plus-rod part of the transperent part. you can then pry the part up. (21 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
| |
| | Re: New cool trucks, looks like scale 1:13
|
|
(...) Yes indead they're great. First he built the red Mercedes. It looks like he changed it. The low loader probably is a Nooteboom. The builder asked me for information a few months ago and I supplied him some drawings. It turned out very well as (...) (21 years ago, 30-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Gearbox 8860 trouble
|
|
snip > (...) shift can (...) (iirc ;) ) (...) looking at (...) cover up (...) It sure do, thank you. I suspected that I had to use my brain instead of following the instructions. ;-) When I build sets I´m a Lego-purist and want to build exactly as (...) (21 years ago, 29-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Hailfire Droid -- Why Not a Technic Set?
|
|
(...) I had nothing to do today, so I made this list for conspiracy theorists to discuss: Set # Set Name Year TECHNIC (Y/N)? 4481 Hailfire Droid 2003 N 8000 Pit Droid 2000 Y 8001 Battle Droid 2000 Y 8002 Destroyer Droid 2000 Y 8007 C-3PO 2001 Y 8008 (...) (21 years ago, 29-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.starwars, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Hailfire Droid -- Why Not a Technic Set?
|
|
My opinion is that when a set comes with 0 LEGO bricks, there's no question that it's a (very recent) TECHNIC set.* I'm looking at my own Hailfire Droid I just got for Christmas, and I just can't find any. It's all liftarms and axles. Come to think (...) (21 years ago, 29-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: New cool trucks, looks like scale 1:13
|
|
(...) Well, one level up, and there is a lot more pictures... (URL) Andersen (21 years ago, 29-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | New cool trucks, looks like scale 1:13
|
|
Hey Just found these on brickshelf: (URL) like them a lot.... Kim Andersen (21 years ago, 29-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | How to remove a part
|
|
Hi all, Can anyone give me a tip on how to remove the transparant piece from the red mask? See: (URL) (not a very clear picture). Thanks. Jaco (21 years ago, 28-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
| |
| | Re: Gearbox 8860 trouble
|
|
"Jennifer Clark" <jen@vulture.dmem.strath.ac.uk> schreef in bericht news:HqLGzx.235n@lugnet.com... (...) (iirc ;) ) (...) here! I (...) when you (...) the (...) to (...) It sure did! (...) when (...) gearbox (...) Check the building instructions... (...) (21 years ago, 28-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Gearbox 8860 trouble
|
|
(...) I remember this too, Christmas of 1980 I think it was. Serious nostalgia here! I think the reason for the cover was that the engine fairly rattles along when you push the car in the lowest gear, which is fine as long as you have built the (...) (21 years ago, 28-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Hailfire Droid -- Why Not a Technic Set?
|
|
The mystery continues! :) onedaycnn (sid) (URL) (21 years ago, 28-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Hailfire Droid -- Why Not a Technic Set?
|
|
(...) Actually, thats only partly true. Up thru model year 2001, there were several sets which had both TECHNIC and Star Wars on the box front. R2-D2 and the Destroyer Droid are two that come to mind. Also many of the 2001 Bionicle sets had TECHNIC (...) (21 years ago, 28-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Hailfire Droid -- Why Not a Technic Set?
|
|
(...) Hailfire droid is made with technic parts, but they had to license the rights to make it from George Lucas, so they are required to label it Star Wars. LEGO does not use double labels. Many sets use technic parts, but are not labeled technic. (...) (21 years ago, 28-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Hailfire Droid -- Why Not a Technic Set?
|
|
(...) My favorite set of 2003, the 8455 Backhoe, is officially labeled Technic/ (...) Kevin (21 years ago, 28-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Hailfire Droid -- Why Not a Technic Set?
|
|
(...) year 2001. Beginning with model year 2002, almost all sets were rebranded with things like "BIONICLE", "RACERS", "STAR WARS", etc. I have been told that there are a few higher-end sets still marked TECHNIC, but I have yet to see one. Ray (21 years ago, 28-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Hailfire Droid -- Why Not a Technic Set?
|
|
Just wondering... onedaycnn (sid) (URL) (21 years ago, 28-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: JCB JS220 Excavator
|
|
(...) Hello Here is a link to a MLcad file: (URL) 2.mpd I don't have enough Lego pieces to build the whole thing so I have been experimenting with what I do have and then building in MLcad. The only trouble I am having is to do with the front part (...) (21 years ago, 28-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Gearbox 8860 trouble
|
|
(...) Waking up more and actually running off to find the instructions and looking at 'em... Step 17--don't put the 2x3 plate in, instead, use a 2x2 plate and don't cover up the third space for the stick shift... Rest of the steps are fine. Hope (...) (21 years ago, 27-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Gearbox 8860 trouble
|
|
(...) remove the 2x4 plate, then use whatever blue plates so that the stick shift can be in 3 separate positions I built this car with 3 gears many years ago... that's how I did it (iirc ;) ) Dave K (21 years ago, 27-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Gearbox 8860 trouble
|
|
Hi, I´m having a slight problem building the gearbox on the 8860... How many gears is it supposed to have? It is technically able to have 3, but if you follow the instructions its impossible to use more than 2. Check this scan of page 16 out and (...) (21 years ago, 27-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: (Some) HiTechnic Sensors to be Produced Once Again?
|
|
(...) This is true. I got confirmation from John Barnes when Steve Hassenplug announced this a few weeks back. (...) Kevin (21 years ago, 27-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | (Some) HiTechnic Sensors to be Produced Once Again?
|
|
Looks like it to me. (URL) know more? Max (21 years ago, 27-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic set 8855
|
|
(...) Nikhil, Try this: (URL) Dennis Bosman (URL) LEGO Trucks & Heavy Equipment> (21 years ago, 26-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: JCB JS220 Excavator
|
|
(...) Hi Jonathan, What exactly is your problem? Doesn't fit the arm to the superstructure or is the superstructure too weak? Do you have pictures of your work in progress? Dennis Bosman (URL) LEGO Trucks & Heavy Equipment> (21 years ago, 26-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: JCB JS220 Excavator
|
|
(...) Hi Max, The hand controller is very easy to build. After seeying Jennifer's model on the Modelshow Europe earlier this year I immediately started to build my own unit without having pictures of hers. (4 URLs) Dennis Bosman (URL) LEGO Trucks & (...) (21 years ago, 26-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Merry Christmas
|
|
Hi all, I hope that this time of year finds all well. I'm still lamenting Travis' death. To those who celebrate it: Merry Christmas! Kevin (21 years ago, 25-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: JCB JS220 Excavator
|
|
(...) Simply amazing! The superstructure design and detail is so close to the real JS220 that at a glance it is difficult to discern between real and Lego. What makes it more amazing is the amount of mechanical stuff underneath the superstructure. (...) (21 years ago, 24-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New Williams
|
|
(...) Thanks! (...) Thanks muchly! Here's the secrets of the front steering/wishbone suspension module: (URL) and here: (URL) It uses an old style steering linkage (cant remember part number, will post as soon as I find) sandwiched between two 1x3 (...) (21 years ago, 22-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam, FTX)
|
| |
| | Lego Flight
|
|
Hey I'm back at it with the start of a new glider. Right now its just being built, though I am trying some new ideas. The biggest new feature will be air foil shapped wings. I do have one question though. Do you guys think that a rough air foil (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New Williams
|
|
(...) Cool looking model, Matthew... but I've got some questions: I can see some kind of steering. How does it work? How could you add steering to those real A-arms (and not having to do that using the conventional method) and fit it to the narrow (...) (21 years ago, 19-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I was thinking about bipedal walkers this morning and....
|
|
(...) It doesn't work (yet), but it's very close... (URL) K (21 years ago, 19-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: I was thinking about bipedal walkers this morning and....
|
|
(...) I have almost nothing to contribute to discussions re: robotics, but I spotted this marginally relevant story on cnn.com: (URL) of course. Dave! (21 years ago, 19-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic set 8855
|
|
XFUT: lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade (...) Or Bricklink, there's at least one in a sealed box: (URL) Best regards, /Tobbe (URL) (remove SPAM when e-mailing) (21 years ago, 19-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic set 8855
|
|
(...) You can try eBay: (URL) This set usualy appears from time to time. Currently there's one, but it's ending in six hours so you must hurry. - David (21 years ago, 19-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: I was thinking about bipedal walkers this morning and....
|
|
Lots of responses to my post, so I'm following up my own post to address all of them. A lot of people are pointing out that this has been done before in the field of robotics, but what I was actually asking about is if it's been done before in (...) (21 years ago, 19-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Technic set 8855
|
|
This came out when I was about 11 and I wanted it so bad. Two problems: 1. It wasn't available in India at that time 2. None of my relatives were kind enough to shell out $120 for it Fast forward 14 years, I'm now in the US, am employed and have (...) (21 years ago, 19-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: I was thinking about bipedal walkers this morning and....
|
|
(...) Parallax markets the Toddler, which is a walking Robot that shifts its center of gravity to walk. It turns by sliding its feet in opposite directions. It has 34 possible movements. (21 years ago, 19-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: I was thinking about bipedal walkers this morning and....
|
|
Now, think about what physically goes into making yourself walk. How much energy and control is involved? Try walking on a flat, level surface (or better, one at a slight decline, like a very long handicap ramp). Walk with your natural gait, at the (...) (21 years ago, 19-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: JCB JS220 Excavator
|
|
Hello I have been trying to build a model based on this one. But I have been having trouble on how to connect the boom or arm to the super structure. If anyone has any idea please share. Thanks "Jennifer Clark" <jen@vulture.dmem.strath.ac.uk> wrote (...) (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: I was thinking about bipedal walkers this morning and....
|
|
(...) More info here (URL) (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: I was thinking about bipedal walkers this morning and....
|
|
(...) Dunno but this non-LEGO robot (with knees) has been taught to run (URL) wish there was a video available on the net somewhere - I saw it on TV yesterday, and though it's difficult to tell it's running, it does seem rather more "human-like" (...) (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Connecting New Cylinders
|
|
(...) I think I'd be worried that bending forces when operating the cylinders could cause the thin liftarm to snap the inlet. At least with the wide liftarm, the forces would be carried by a substantially larger area, and with the hose also (...) (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: I was thinking about bipedal walkers this morning and....
|
|
(...) Hi Mark, I have never seen a walker like this. I'd be the last person to say it can't be done. Kevin (...) (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | I was thinking about bipedal walkers this morning and....
|
|
Consider the way we walk... we start by effectively starting to lean slightly forward, and we swing a leg some distance in front of ourselves to stop from falling. We then start to bring the other leg forward as we reupright ourselves and repeat the (...) (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Connecting New Cylinders
|
|
(...) This solution should also work for small pistons. I'd have less concerns about breaking them due to excess stress. Kevin (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Connecting New Cylinders
|
|
"Ross Crawford" <rosscraw@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message news:Hq36E4.1q4v@lugnet.com... (...) no doubt it is i thought thin liftarm with piston vents inside axleholes could join pistons better (stronger) but wide liftarm is a very good solution (...) (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Connecting New Cylinders
|
|
(...) Of course if you could use the thin liftarm it would be better, but I think the wide liftarm is also an elegant solution :) ROSCO (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Connecting New Cylinders
|
|
sorry tobbe :) i'm sure you know what i mean you are just joking right? :)))) pixel "Tobbe Arnesson" <StPnAtM@lotek.nu> wrote in message news:Hq1sqo.13rM@lugnet.com... (...) (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Connecting New Cylinders
|
|
hi philo it's a pitty it could be elegant solution :) of course you checked liftarm's axlehole :) ie 1x2 liftarm pixel "Philippe Hurbain" <philohome@free.fr> wrote in message news:Hq1sxr.16Jo@lugnet.com... (...) (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New Williams
|
|
Matt, Very nice work! Your car looks great. The only thing I would do is add a few of the aero bits between the front wing and radiator intake if possible. Williams upgraded their website and there is some nice info on the fw25. Keep up the good (...) (21 years ago, 17-Dec-03, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Connecting New Cylinders
|
|
Hi Pixel, (...) Yes, they fit perfectly (...) Unfortunately no, the pneumatic tube is very loose on the remaining part of the vent :( Philo (21 years ago, 17-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Connecting New Cylinders
|
|
(...) Eeehhh... What? /Tobbe (21 years ago, 17-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Connecting New Cylinders
|
|
i'm just curious is it possible to put piston's vents inside the axlehole? if yes then maybe the rest of vent will stick out enough to still join the tube hmm? pixel "Tobbe Arnesson" <StPnAtM@lotek.nu> wrote in message news:Hq1HJ7.rDH@lugnet.com... (...) (21 years ago, 17-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Connecting New Cylinders
|
|
(...) I knew it would be a hassle to connect this new cylinder back-to-back! Too bad TLC did not put an axle hole in it :( I must say Mark's version looks like a winner (right until the inlet pops off :) )! -- Best regards, /Tobbe (URL) (remove SPAM (...) (21 years ago, 17-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New Williams
|
|
XFUT: lugnet.modelteam Nice model Matthew. Here's the BS-folder with the rest of the pics: (URL) -- Best regards, /Tobbe (URL) (remove SPAM when e-mailing) (...) (21 years ago, 17-Dec-03, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: new design for microwalkers
|
|
(...) A whole jungle of walkers :) (21 years ago, 17-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Modified, Motorized 8466 Off-Roader
|
|
Yikes, that's one ugly off-roader but insanely cool! Good job! Love the outdoor action shots! Cool idea with the dif. mod too! (21 years ago, 17-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Modified, Motorized 8466 Off-Roader
|
|
(...) Here's the front differential. Only the front end has a differential, the rear is solid, I guess you could call it permanently locked. (2 URLs) PLMKWYT Nathan Falslev (21 years ago, 17-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: new design for microwalkers
|
|
The Zoo is now open!! (...) (21 years ago, 16-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: some pneumatic stuff
|
|
"Kevin L. Clague" <kevin_clague@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:Hpy4Ay.1r7s@lugnet.com... (...) i knew the name is not good :) and ofcourse i uploaded wrong picture grrrr sorry now it's correct DL (URL) should release some pressure when it's high (...) (21 years ago, 16-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | New Williams
|
|
Hi all- Delurking Welcome to my new incarnation of my williams fw25 - version 5 revision "B" (2 URLs) It's taken me all year, but I finally have a perfect model - now I get to do it all again when williams release their fw26:) PLMKWYT - I need the (...) (21 years ago, 16-Dec-03, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Connecting New Cylinders
|
|
(...) Well, the first example is in a post by Dennis Boseman: (URL) used them in my original and/or gates. A single piston can give you two stable states, expanded or contracted. Two pistons can give you three lengths with four stable states: (...) (21 years ago, 15-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Modified, Motorized 8466 Off-Roader
|
|
I've been working on this for a little while. I've strengthened the suspension and drivetrain on the front of the 8466, and created an entirely new rear suspension that articulates over just about everything. The vehicle is 4 wheel drive, (...) (21 years ago, 15-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: some pneumatic stuff
|
|
(...) What is a protection valve? (...) A piston with both ports used, and a switch with all three ports used is a transistor, right? (...) Kevin (21 years ago, 15-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | some pneumatic stuff
|
|
hi thinking about pneumatics i found an idea of protection valve DL (URL) pneumatic transistor :))))) DL (URL) (21 years ago, 15-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: The badgers have driven me insane...
|
|
(...) This badgerthing is seriously thretening my health. Each time some new version of the theme shows up I laugh so hard I allmost suffocate! My personal health aside, good work dude! Can't wait to se the Snake in Lego... /Henrik ps. (URL) (21 years ago, 15-Dec-03, to lugnet.build.sculpture, lugnet.technic, lugnet.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: JCB JS220 Excavator
|
|
Hello Could you please let us know when you have posted the CAD files. I would love to build one. Thanks (21 years ago, 15-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Connecting New Cylinders
|
|
(...) Probably what amounts to a braindead question coming up... Could someone describes some possible applications for this design pattern? Thanks >> Mark (21 years ago, 14-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Connecting New Cylinders
|
|
Hi Jonathan, For the loading crane of my MAN tipper truck I've connected to old style cylinders with 1/2 pins and plate corners. In the crane arm there's only space for a two studs wide cylinder so I've glued to together :) (URL) Dennis Bosman (URL) (...) (21 years ago, 14-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Connecting New Cylinders
|
|
(...) Rather thank Mark... I just made the photograph :o) Philo (21 years ago, 13-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Connecting New Cylinders
|
|
(...) Thanks Philo for the ideas, I find them very useful. (21 years ago, 13-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Connecting New Cylinders
|
|
Thanks Kevin for the ideas. (21 years ago, 13-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Connecting New Cylinders
|
|
(...) It works very well! (URL) Philo (21 years ago, 12-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: JCB JS220 Excavator
|
|
(...) I keep most of them built up these days, you are right, it is definitely hard to take these apart, they take months to build... Really the only time I think about taking a model apart is when it is superceded by a better one. Jennifer (21 years ago, 12-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Connecting New Cylinders
|
|
(...) Well, I don't have any of the new pistons so this may not work, but have a look at this setup (click for larger view): (URL) With the new pistons, you should be able to use the new 1x2 liftarms instead. To get the liftarm to seat properly over (...) (21 years ago, 12-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | My first swiled LEGO
|
|
I called LEGO the other day about a piston that had a broken off pressure port, and got a replacement. The replacement piston has swirls of a darker colored plastic in the yellow cylinder part as can be seen here in the right piston. (URL) not aware (...) (21 years ago, 12-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Connecting New Cylinders
|
|
(...) Hi Jonathan, Here is a second version. The gaps between two back to back are not nice integral stud lengths. This makes it a pain. It turns out that the larger of the two gaps is the pretty close to the distance between the outer edges of (...) (21 years ago, 12-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Connecting New Cylinders
|
|
(...) Hi Jonathan, I'd never tried this, but was able to come up with this: (URL) problem with it is that the pistons are not in perfect alignment. (URL) (21 years ago, 12-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: JCB JS220 Excavator
|
|
(...) A comment on how you might be able to control the speed of pneumatics is to add an orifice to both of the line of the cylinder. This would regulate the amount and speed of the air entering and leaving the cylinder. Hope this gives you some (...) (21 years ago, 12-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Connecting New Cylinders
|
|
Hello I am trying to connect two of the new form factor cylinders back-to-back. Does any one have any ideas? I wish only to use lego parts. Thanks (21 years ago, 12-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Pneumatic hoses
|
|
(...) sells fish tanks & supplies. We used it to make a couple of long (1.5m) tubing lengths, it worked very well and was basically a perfect fit on the Lego peumatic pieces. JohnG, GMLTC (21 years ago, 11-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Pneumatic hoses
|
|
(...) There's always fuel hose for model airplanes, but that's expensive (high grade silicone to be fuel and heat resistant). Another source is your well sorted car part dealer, they have thin vacuum hoses that might fit. A friend used this and it's (...) (21 years ago, 11-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: 2004 Products see?
|
|
(...) What you got there is a regular sized antenna, put through a 1x1 cone, and then through the hole on a 1x1 clip/holder/thingy. You can see the butt of the antenna on the other side. Most defenitly a regular sized antenna. It would be nice to (...) (21 years ago, 10-Dec-03, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.castle, lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 2004 Products see?
|
|
It looks like the trans-orange antennae on the side of the 8380 race set (1st race set listed): (...) is a new, shorter size antenna. Anyone else think so? David "Fuzzy" Gregory (21 years ago, 10-Dec-03, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.castle, lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Pneumatic hoses
|
|
Hi Morten, for the interconnection of a pneumatic remote control with the model I use the isolation tube of the cables used for the electric installation of a house. It has a cross section of 1.5 mm^2. The isolation fits perfectly and air tight in (...) (21 years ago, 9-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: 2004 Products see?
|
|
"Aaron Muhl" <Aaron_Muhl@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:HpM8DI.22vI@lugnet.com... (...) thankyouthankyouthan...outhankyou I've been trying to see Xpod pics for a very long time. Now I'm trying to figure out what the lid is. At first glance it (...) (21 years ago, 9-Dec-03, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.castle, lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.technic, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: 2004 Products see?
|
|
Thanks for the leaks! Unfortunately, no good castle sets there.... The pirate sets looked interesting until I looked closer at the figures. BTW, congrats to .space! There is a "pod" set! -Aaron "matt doyle" <parisinflames08@yahoo.com> wrote in (...) (21 years ago, 9-Dec-03, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.castle, lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.technic, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: 2004 Products see?
|
|
Leak.... Save 'em while they're still there im sure they will be gone shortly (18 URLs) (21 years ago, 9-Dec-03, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.pirates, lugnet.castle, lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Pneumatic hoses
|
|
(...) I bought mine from Revol in France ((URL) "Tuyau"), but their website is only in french though they seem to be able to sell internationnally. Philo (21 years ago, 8-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Burger King Bionicles
|
|
Saw the new Burger King Bionicle offers today (didn't buy as I was too hungry images of the figurines (not really lego at all(and I don't mean that ikn a Biuonicle sense!)) can be seen at (URL) meal comes in a box propertioned like a lego set box (...) (21 years ago, 7-Dec-03, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| |
| | Re: Pneumatic hoses
|
|
(...) You can try Fisher Scientific or any other laboratory supplier (sorry-I don't know any in DK). They sell silicon tubing also in medical equipment stores. Best you can do is to go and ask in your nearest pharmacy. They usually help. Robert (21 years ago, 7-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | One more Toa Symbol Cube Animation
|
|
(URL) mentioned somewhere: (URL) (21 years ago, 7-Dec-03, to lugnet.animation, lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
| |
| | Re: Pneumatic hoses
|
|
(...) (URL) it helps, Martin (21 years ago, 7-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Catapult
|
|
Hi everybody, After lastweek James Brink’s Trebuchets (which is great BTW) I started building a catapult myself. After the great war that Castle become Bionicles I toyed and built a catapult from Technic/Bionicles parts. I'm proud to present my 2nd (...) (21 years ago, 7-Dec-03, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.build.contests, lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.technic, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: Pneumatic hoses
|
|
"Philippe Hurbain" <philohome@free.fr> skrev i en meddelelse news:HpHqsx.3Mr@lugnet.com... (...) Can't seem to find any dealers at all :( -- Mvh. Morten Trab Web: (URL) (21 years ago, 7-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | RE: Pneumatic hoses
|
|
Bricklink appears to be having email problems at the moment. I suspect it is just a temporary glitch -----Original Message----- From: news-gateway@lugnet.com [mailto:news-gateway...net.com]On Behalf Of Morten Trab Sent: 07 December 2003 09:10 To: (...) (21 years ago, 7-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Pneumatic hoses
|
|
"Kevin L. Clague" <kevin_clague@yahoo.com> skrev i en meddelelse news:HpHLCD.170q@lugnet.com... (...) I've tried registering an account with 2 different e-mails (my own and my hotmail account) but neither of them recieves any mails :( -- Mvh. Morten (...) (21 years ago, 7-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: The LEGO Racers theme should have its own newsgroup.
|
|
(...) Ok, I just looked in my 2003 Holiday catalog (which includes 8455). I do not see any mention of Technic in the catalog. To me, 8455 is certainly a Technic set, no question. But there are *some* Racers sets which I would also call Technic sets (...) (21 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Pneumatic hoses
|
|
(...) We (several FreeLUG members) bought Versilic silicone tubing ((URL) 4mm external diameter, 2mm internal. Though primarily intended for medical use, it is very similar to LEGO tubing (translucent clear), we got 25 meters packs for 28 euros (...) (21 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | RE: Pneumatic hoses
|
|
You can always join pneumatic hose with short sections of flex hose -----Original Message----- From: news-gateway@lugnet.com [mailto:news-gateway...net.com]On Behalf Of Morten Trab Sent: 06 December 2003 19:53 To: lugnet.technic@lugnet.com Subject: (...) (21 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
