Subject:
|
Re: Connecting New Cylinders
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 22:56:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2320 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Paul Kleniewski wrote:
>
> "Ross Crawford" <rosscraw@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message news:Hq36E4.1q4v@lugnet.com...
> > Of course if you could use the thin liftarm it would be better, but I think the
> > wide liftarm is also an elegant solution :)
> >
> > ROSCO
>
> no doubt it is
>
> i thought thin liftarm with piston vents inside axleholes
> could join pistons better (stronger)
> but wide liftarm is a very good solution
I think I'd be worried that bending forces when operating the cylinders could
cause the thin liftarm to snap the inlet. At least with the wide liftarm, the
forces would be carried by a substantially larger area, and with the hose also
providing a little "cushion".
ROSCO
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Connecting New Cylinders
|
| "Ross Crawford" <rosscraw@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message news:Hq36E4.1q4v@lugnet.com... (...) no doubt it is i thought thin liftarm with piston vents inside axleholes could join pistons better (stronger) but wide liftarm is a very good solution (...) (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
