Debate : 17437


Off-Topic / Debate / 17437	17436 \| 17438

Subject:	Re: "Peace" can be dangerous (was: Re: Peruvian Indians [Re: ..)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Thu, 22 Aug 2002 08:47:05 GMT
Viewed:	853 times

> > What do you mean? Isn't that the goal? The only goal? Isn't saving lives > > the whole reason for concern? I hope it's not just about retribution for >you. > > My point is that *any* amount of terrorism is unacceptable. One man's terrorist is an other man's partisan. Marek Edelman was one of the leaders of the Warsaw ghetto uprising of the Jews against the Nazis in 1943. Is he a terrorist or a freedom fighter? Should his living relatives be punished for his actions? Scott A

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: "Peace" can be dangerous (was: Re: Peruvian Indians [Re: ..)
(...) Irrelevant. I reject your comparison of Nazi Germany's occupation and Israel's, and am rather offended by it. -John (22 years ago, 24-Aug-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: "Peace" can be dangerous (was: Re: Peruvian Indians [Re: ..)
(...) My point is that any amount of terrorism is unacceptable. So the fact that the number of homicide bombers reduces from say 10 a month to 2 a month is irrelevant-- any amount is too many. (...) What I am trying to point out is that as long (...) (22 years ago, 16-Aug-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

44 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search