Subject:
|
Re: Peruvian Indians [Re: Is the Palestinian Cause Dead? The Latest Terror Attacks]
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 8 Aug 2002 16:37:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
563 times
|
| |
|
|
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> > This guy is in *serious* denial. His thinking is more dangerous to Israel
> > than Hamas itself.
> I am not understanding your comments here, John.
What's so hard to understand? The guy is not grasping reality:
"The Palestinians cannot drive us away - they have long acknowledged our
existence.
This is simply not true, as I cited.
They have been ready to make peace with us; it is we who are
unwilling to make peace with them.
??? When are they ready-- between terrorist attacks?
It is we who insist on maintaining our control over them; it is we who escalate
the situation in the region and feed the cycle of bloodshed. I regret to say
it, but the blame is entirely ours."
I regret to say it, and I feel for his loss, but he's not in touch with
reality. The blame is *NOT* entirely Israel's.
> Here is a guy who despite what must be tremendous personal loss and grief is
> STILL seeking peace. Rather than look for fault on the other side, he is
> introspecting and finding flaws with the Israeli side of the equation. His
> solution is to seek the same path to peace his own departed son favored. In
> trying to carry on with his son's political beliefs he seems to be honoring
> his son in the best possible way and for the noblest of causes: peace.
>
> In all honesty, how can you find fault with this noble Israeli's views? If
> everyone on both sides of the conflict were as self-sacrificing as this one
> guy we'd have peace in the middle-east overnight.
Oh, I admire his *willingness* for peace. But the reality is that Hamas would
kill him and every other Israeli in a New York minute if they could. And they
will continue to do so, or die trying. _They do not want peace_. Period. End
of story. *This* is the harsh reality that the world MUST, *but is unwilling*,
to acknowledge.
If only one side wants peace, then you really can't have peace, now can you?
(unless, of course, the other side kills all of the peace-lovers).
-John
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
44 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
