To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 17400
17399  |  17401
Subject: 
Re: "Peace" can be dangerous (was: Re: Peruvian Indians [Re: ..)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 9 Aug 2002 07:39:03 GMT
Viewed: 
603 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:

Yitzhak Frankenthal?s son was killed by the Palestinians while serving in
the IDF. This is what he said of his son?s killers:

The Palestinians cannot drive us away - they have long acknowledged our
existence. They have been ready to make peace with us; it is we who are
unwilling to make peace with them. It is we who insist on maintaining our
control over them; it is we who escalate the situation in the region and
feed the cycle of bloodshed. I regret to say it, but the blame is entirely
ours.

This guy is in *serious* denial.  His thinking is more dangerous to Israel
than Hamas itself.

In what way John? Personally, I think what he is trying to do is laudable:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2000/11/15/MN74126.DTL

Why is peace so dangerous in your view?

Because the Palestinians are not one-minded.

Hamas, for instance, has publically declared their desire to not end their
fight until Israel is no longer.  Peace is dangerous when one side's idea of it
is the elimination of the other side.

There are those in Israel who want to do the same to the Palestinians. You
are using the views of extremists to condemn a whole nation.

In the post you responded to I cited two articles. You chose to criticise
the one backing dialogue and mutual respect. This is despite the unpalatable
nature of the second text:

"I am sure that Jews kill Arabs only for self-defence and justice, but Arabs
do it because they like to kill."

"The Arab has the instinct of murder and killing like all gentiles, and only
Jews do not have that instinct - that is a genetic fact."

So why label peace as "dangerous" and let racism off the hook? Do you not
view the comments in the second text as "dangerous" also?





When I see Palestinians resist their own who sabotage their efforts for peace
(ie Hamas) will I become hopeful.


Perhaps others say the same of the IDF.

Scott A

-John



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: "Peace" can be dangerous (was: Re: Peruvian Indians [Re: ..)
 
(...) Wanting and doing are two very different things. Besides, I have tried to make distinctions between Palestinian extremists and the GP all the time. It is my criticism of them that *they* aren't making that distinction more. (...) Those views (...) (22 years ago, 9-Aug-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  "Peace" can be dangerous (was: Re: Peruvian Indians [Re: ..)
 
(...) Because the Palestinians are not one-minded. Hamas, for instance, has publically declared their desire to not end their fight until Israel is no longer. Peace is dangerous when one side's idea of it is the elimination of the other side. When I (...) (22 years ago, 8-Aug-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

44 Messages in This Thread:














Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR