| |
Christopher Weeks wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
>
> > But Tom... Under the system proposed by Larry, if your plane were to fall
> > from the skies your loved ones would be able to tale the airlines to the
> > cleaners. Is that not good enough for you?
> >
> > :)
>
> Why the smiley? It's certainly good enough for me! What better to avoid such
> disasters than the certainty that rapid and humongous suits would follow?
A lot of good that does the people that die from the incident. I would rather
choose not to be one of those people.
--
| Tom Stangl, iPlanet Web Server Technical Support
| Sun Microsystems Customer Service
| iPlanet Support - http://www.iplanet.com/support/
| Please do not associate my personal views with my employer
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: The big lie
|
| (...) Very understandable. We all want to minimise risk! You may want to consider not getting out of bed in the morning, then, on a regular basis. It's a big bad risky world out there. Except, wait, that turns out to be riskier than being active. (23 years ago, 5-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: The big lie
|
| (...) such (...) I would certainly rather not have my plane fall from the sky. That is precisely why I'd rather there be real consequences to such an accident. I assume and believe: 1) Getting airplanes to fly doesn't require voodoo. 2) A well (...) (23 years ago, 6-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: The big lie
|
| (...) Why the smiley? It's certainly good enough for me! What better to avoid such disasters than the certainty that rapid and humongous suits would follow? Chris (23 years ago, 5-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
74 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
