To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 13465
13464  |  13466
Subject: 
Re: The big lie
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 5 Oct 2001 18:09:58 GMT
Viewed: 
881 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:

But Tom... Under the system proposed by Larry, if your plane were to fall
from the skies your loved ones would be able to tale the airlines to the
cleaners. Is that not good enough for you?

Why the smiley?  It's certainly good enough for me!  What better to avoid such
disasters than the certainty that rapid and humongous suits would follow?

  That's fine on paper, but I'm willing to bet that airlines will, in really
short order, retain the most expensive and effective lawyers money can buy,
far in excess of the ability of the individual to afford, even if a
class-action suit is filed.  So when the airlines get off with a
small-settlement-no-admission-of-fault sort of a judgment, what happens
thereafter?
  Further, it would seem to me that airlines could make some argument like
"crashed or not, it's our sovereign property" and thereby prevent a
plantiff's attorneys from investigating the debris. I'm not convinced that
any case launched in the absence of federal regulation would have much
chance of success or serious compensation. Moreover, and bearing that in
mind, does anyone doubt that airlines would undertake cost studies to
determine a comfortable margin of liability and happily cut their financial
losses at the expense of passengers' lives?

     Dave!



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: The big lie
 
(...) I'll take the other side of that bet in a heartbeat. As long as I get to set the overall rules of the game, that is. You can even call me on whether they conform to my principles or not. (...) Won't happen... unless that's the right outcome. (...) (23 years ago, 5-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The big lie
 
(...) Why the smiley? It's certainly good enough for me! What better to avoid such disasters than the certainty that rapid and humongous suits would follow? Chris (23 years ago, 5-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

74 Messages in This Thread:



















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR