| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> I was talking more about how the air industry has weakened security
> proposals in the past - not their failure to implement existing
> regulations.
Because it was expensive. Everything has a price and sometimes we're not
willing to pay it.
> My worry is that if the market is allowed to dictate airline safety then the
> safety may become heavy with superficial safety issues and the ones the
> public does not understand fully (say widget maintenance) slip. Safety
> should be based on risk assessment not focus groups or public hysteria .
I agree with the final comment. Why would a government agency provide more
sure widget maintenance than would a private corporation.
> I thought the big right wing gripe on this group was that private was
> better than public? Now you are saying they are just the same?
I'm not part of the right wing, so ask someone else. To the extent that I
believe private is better, it is based on the health of competition, the value
of freedom (in all forms), and the extent to which it is difficult to slip into
stagnant bureaucracy mode when you're answerable to some people.
> I just worry about corporations cutting corners for the sake of profit. That
> is what happened here:
> From:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/americas/newsid_1538000/1538682.stm
> ==+==
> Within the last decade, a major commission headed by then US Vice-President
> Al Gore recommended increasing security to international levels - but the
> industry opposed the idea so strongly that the plan was never adopted, say
> industry insiders.
> ==+==
It was too expensive.
Chris
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: The big lie
|
| (...) But a good deal of others are. Over the last few weeks there has been a lot of talk about how weak air security within the US compared the the rest of the "west". (...) Like I said, I just worry about corners being cut. Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 3-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: The big lie
|
| (...) ??? The FAA has fined airlines many times for rebadging used parts (or dangerous/damaged parts) as certified for re-use. Seems damned obvious to me that the private corps are trying to cut widget maintenance costs IN SPITE OF government agency (...) (23 years ago, 5-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: The big lie
|
| (...) hideous, (...) I was talking more about how the air industry has weakened security proposals in the past - not their failure to implement existing regulations. (...) it's (...) it. (...) So (...) work, (...) My worry is that if the market is (...) (23 years ago, 2-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
74 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
