To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 13433
13432  |  13434
Subject: 
Re: The big lie
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 5 Oct 2001 08:26:40 GMT
Viewed: 
910 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:

Like I said, I just worry about corners being cut.

Me too. This is a very valid concern, and it's true for more than just this
particular instance.

So you should support mechanisms that are likely to reduce the probability
of corners being cut and oppose mechanisms that are likely to increase it,
right?

What is the question? It reads like some sort of order, but is has a "?" at
the end.


As has been demonstrated,

Where?

removing culpability and accountability and
consequences tend to increase this probability. That's true whether the
organization dodging is private or public, although it's more likely to
occur with public organizations, which have inherently less accountability.

In what way?


What we are seeing with the airlines is major dodging. But the dodging is
being done by using political power, not by market forces. See Friedman.

Nope. Market forces in forced this issue.


You should be arguing against organizations using political power for gain.

Should I?


You should be arguing for mechanisms that increase culpability and
accountability. Unless, like Lawrence W. you feel that it's the civilized
thing to allow people and organizations not to face the consequences of
their actions.

I should?

Scott A


++Lar



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: The big lie
 
(...) Seemed pretty obvious to me. It is a yes/no question. (...) Are you actually engaging in grammar flaming? That's a yes/no question, by the way, in case you weren't sure. If you're going to ding me for a misplaced question mark (which in this (...) (23 years ago, 5-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The big lie
 
(...) Me too. This is a very valid concern, and it's true for more than just this particular instance. So you should support mechanisms that are likely to reduce the probability of corners being cut and oppose mechanisms that are likely to increase (...) (23 years ago, 4-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

74 Messages in This Thread:



















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR