To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 13186
13185  |  13187
Subject: 
Re: The big lie
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 25 Sep 2001 03:29:34 GMT
Viewed: 
345 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:

You try to scare as all with talk of "blanket unauthorised wiretap powers"
when I doubt they are even on the agenda.

Don't just take my word for it: See the wiretap section of this page:

http://www.aclu.org/news/2001/n092001e.html

(the ACLU and the LP are hardly allies on much of anything these days...
except civil liberties).

As for your "willing to authorise innocent deaths" red herring, it's your
usual spew.

++Lar



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: The big lie
 
(...) Hardly. Perhaps you should read you own posts. A quick search finds these 2 where you condone civilian deaths: (URL) note that in your reply, you failed to address these points: 1. Your apparent departure from your usual LP dogma. 2. Your (...) (23 years ago, 25-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The big lie
 
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:GJx8oE.2rq@lugnet.com... (...) Rights? (...) of (...) With regards to airport security, I would have thought you would want to leave it to the airlines to improve security? (...) (...) (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

74 Messages in This Thread:



















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR