To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.market.theoryOpen lugnet.market.theory in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Marketplace / Theory / 1934
1933  |  1935
Subject: 
Re: LARGEST LEGO LOT ON EBAY EVER!! (???)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.market.theory
Date: 
Fri, 9 Feb 2001 18:20:02 GMT
Viewed: 
15 times
  
In lugnet.general, Frank Filz writes:
William Brumbach wrote:

<snipped bones good summary>

In lugnet.general, Frank Filz writes:

Sorting out by set REALLY isn't worth it. Trust me. Now it is true that
one could sort into related parts and sell those off, and in fact, if
the collection is at all sorted, this can be very easy.

With a lot the size of this one, you can probably do everything.  If it were
all mine I would sell off the sealed sets first and make some room that way.
Then try to complete as many of the sets as possible, especially older ones,
and put them up in the same manner as Spielbude (and others, his auctions
were the first to come to mind), and move some of the instructions as well
(with the corresponding sets).  Once that stuff is gone, then shift into the
"ibuyifdpriceisright" model of parts lots.  Guy has this down pat, great
presentation, clearly the best method to maximize profits on used pieces
IMO.  Of course, this is just what I would do.

Me feeling is that there are only a handfull of sets (if even that) that
sell for more (or even close to) what their parts sell for. Of course
some of the early sets with no specialty pieces will sell for much more
than their parts would, but I wonder if you can get most of that by
selling the instructions.

   I'd bet so--unless of course they're CA bricks that are still in
   OK condition, the connoisseurs might notice that distinction.
   But I'm totally with Frank on this one.  For purposes of sale,
   breaking up the sets into parts will, 99 times out of 100, garner
   more than the reconstituted sets.  It's definitely less labour-
   intensive, with regard to making sure you have this or that piece.
   With parts lots, you create them as you find them, and the pieces
   dictate the sorting logic rather than the sorting logic dictating
   the pieces.

   BTW, the collection, as of 18:15 GMT 9 February 2001, is at $14,779
   as a high-bid.  I'd bet $25K is not unreasonable as a final offer
   price we'll see (and incidentally is what I figured he'd get for
   it).

   Oh yeah, and Frank, if ever you want to split a collection...;)

   all best,

   Lindsay



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: LARGEST LEGO LOT ON EBAY EVER!! (???)
 
(...) Me feeling is that there are only a handfull of sets (if even that) that sell for more (or even close to) what their parts sell for. Of course some of the early sets with no specialty pieces will sell for much more than their parts would, but (...) (24 years ago, 7-Feb-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.market.theory)

88 Messages in This Thread:
































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR