|
In lugnet.general, Frank Filz writes:
> I am slowly becomming convinced that it isn't worth trying to
> reconstruct sets unless you know a particular set is in a collection,
> and you really want to build it.
I'm not big on "me too" posts but I really have to say how much I agree with
this one. I have bought 2 different large collections, and been part of a
consortium on another. None of them are anywhere near completely put back
together and I don't know if I'll ever have time to do it... and i know
there are some gems in each one.
> I haven't decided yet what the best way
> to document a collection for insurance purposes is, but that might be
> another reason to reconstruct sets.
I really would like to find a solution for this one, as I have a large risk
item hanging out on that...
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
88 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|