Subject:
|
Re: LARGEST LEGO LOT ON EBAY EVER!! (???)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.theory
|
Date:
|
Sat, 3 Feb 2001 23:21:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4219 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.market.theory, Lindsay Frederick Braun writes:
> Now *unsorted* I'd agree with your assessment of the likely value
> someone will place on the collection. I was talking above about the
> potential value of the pieces, if sorted and sold by someone with
> the knowledge to do so strategically.
>
> best,
>
> LFB
The auction listing mentions that he may be willing to take the hi-bid if the
reserve is not met.
<trying to remember the rules of ebay proxy biddy>
Does the proxy bidding of your high-bid only apply *after* you pass the reserve
? In other words, if you bid something below the reserve (but way above the
other guys current bid), I think it goes all the way to your max if you don't
hit the reserve. Normally it takes two bidders to get to a really high bid,
below the reserve I think one can do it.
Ray
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LARGEST LEGO LOT ON EBAY EVER!! (???)
|
| (...) I don't know--your mass/pieces reckoning is fine by me, but you're far undervaluing the market value of the pieces, IMHO. $0.10 is a good rule of thumb buying them at MSRP; even then, we'd be talking $47,500. But my experience of selling parts (...) (26 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
88 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
