Subject:
|
Re: Value of a collection (was: Re: LARGEST LEGO LOT ON EBAY EVER!! (???))
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 6 Feb 2001 21:55:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2060 times
|
| |
|
|
"David Schilling" <davidNO@SPAMsunteleia.com> wrote in message
news:G8Cuyu.Hw1@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.general, Frank Filz writes:
> > .... I haven't decided yet what the best way
> > to document a collection for insurance purposes is, but that might be
> > another reason to reconstruct sets.
>
> There's been a couple of people mentioning this, but no one has • specifically
> asked the question yet: what are some good ways of determining the value • of
> your LEGO collection, for insurance purposes or otherwise.
>
> It seems to me that even a list of all the sets that comprise your
> collection wouldn't be an accurate way. Some sets are worth much more • than
> they used to be, and others much less.
>
> Who has done this? Any ideas?
>
> --
> David Schilling
It has been a while since this was discussed on LUGNET. A while ago I asked
my insureance agent what would be acceptable documentation for my LEGO
collection. She wasn't sure but suggested pictures. I had recently
acquired an Airport Shuttle which at the time was selling regularly on eBay
for about $400. I asked if an auction listing from eBay for the same item
would be acceptable for determining market value and she said it would be.
I should probably go through this excercise with her again as my collection
has grown a fair amount and has some valuable (with respect to what the
market will bear perspective) sets in it.
Mike
--
Mike Walsh - mike_walsh at mindspring dot com
http://www.nclug.net - North Carolina LEGO Users Group
http://www.nclug.net/ctb - Carolina Train Builders
http://www.brickbay.com/store.asp?u=mpw - Brick Depot
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
88 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
