Subject:
|
Re: Interpreting the proposed FACE meta-command
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 4 Oct 1999 13:00:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
921 times
|
| |
|
|
Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote in message ...
> Hmm. I don't like it, but we have already abbreviated
> (counter)clockwise, so it does make sense to abbreviate
> double-sided too. :-(
I was just trying to be consistent...:)
I'd be just as happy if they were all spelled-out.
But I'd like to avoid supporting both abbreviations and the complete
spelling. Every additional test that has to be performed in the tight loop
of a dat file parser will slow down the loading of files.
-Gary
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Interpreting the proposed FACE meta-command
|
| (...) Recognizing multiple forms of the command shouldn't add much to rendering. Each file can be parsed once, and then the post-parsing results cached, for later re-reference. The FACE meta-command would be stored as an opcode and a single (...) (25 years ago, 4-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Interpreting the proposed FACE meta-command
|
| Gary Williams: (...) Very sensible (now that Steve has convinced me). (...) Hmm. I don't like it, but we have already abbreviated (counter)clockwise, so it does make sense to abbreviate double-sided too. :-( Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: (...) (25 years ago, 4-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
56 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
