CAD Development : 2954


CAD / Development / 2954	2953 \| 2955

Subject:	Re: Hidden surface removal, and vertex order in part/primitive DAT files
Newsgroups:	lugnet.cad.dev
Date:	Fri, 1 Oct 1999 12:34:17 GMT
Viewed:	545 times

On Fri, 1 Oct 1999 09:06:35 GMT, sparre@sys-323.risoe.dk (Jacob Sparre Andersen) wrote: > Michael Lachmann: > > > You mentioned that some parts have a "0 CW-Compliant" tag. Could we do > > something to make this a standard? Because than I could read this tag in > > MLCad and make the drawing faster!!!!! > > I think we agreed to use > 0 CW > and > 0 CCW > lines in the beginning of the files to indicate (C)CW > compliancy, but you should have a look at what Steve > actually has written in his parts. I'm willing to change my parts, if the standard changes. Assuming parts which are *not* C(C)W need to be flagged at all. > > Tell me what you think! > > It would be very nice if you implemented this feature. I agree completely. Steve

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Hidden surface removal, and vertex order in part/primitive DAT files
(...) I guess we could at least decide to use CCW to determine the normal of a face, unless there's someone who prefers to use CW ? Leonardo (25 years ago, 1-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Hidden surface removal, and vertex order in part/primitive DAT files
Michael Lachmann: (...) I think we agreed to use 0 CW and 0 CCW lines in the beginning of the files to indicate (C)CW compliancy, but you should have a look at what Steve actually has written in his parts. (...) It would be very nice if you (...) (25 years ago, 1-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

56 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search