CAD Development : 2962


CAD / Development / 2962	2961 \| 2963

Subject:	Re: Hidden surface removal, and vertex order in part/primitive DAT files
Newsgroups:	lugnet.cad.dev
Date:	Fri, 1 Oct 1999 17:17:27 GMT
Viewed:	641 times

Steve Bliss wrote: > > > lines in the beginning of the files to indicate (C)CW > > compliancy, but you should have a look at what Steve > > actually has written in his parts. > > I'm willing to change my parts, if the standard changes. Assuming parts > which are *not* C(C)W need to be flagged at all. I guess we could at least decide to use CCW to determine the normal of a face, unless there's someone who prefers to use CW ? Leonardo

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Hidden surface removal, and vertex order in part/primitive DAT files
Leonardo Zide wrote in message <37F4ECA7.C0BFCF7D@c...com.br>... (...) I'd vote for CW for two reasons: 1) 'Clockwise' is shorter than 'counterclockwise'. 2) CW is used more often than CCW in rendering applications (to my knowledge) because the (...) (25 years ago, 1-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Hidden surface removal, and vertex order in part/primitive DAT files
(...) I'm willing to change my parts, if the standard changes. Assuming parts which are not C(C)W need to be flagged at all. (...) I agree completely. Steve (25 years ago, 1-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

56 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search