Subject:
|
Re: Hidden surface removal, and vertex order in part/primitive DAT files
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 4 Oct 1999 04:21:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
838 times
|
| |
|
|
Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote in message ...
> Gary Williams:
>
> > Michael Lachmann wrote in message ...
> > > What if say a complient file contains anything starting with "0 CW". Any
> > > program dealing with this information could just scan for "0 CW*". We • also
> > > could use a tag "0 AW*" if why ever the orientation is not clock-wice • but
> > > anti-clockwice .... I think a program could deal with that also (just • the
> > > sign is different !?).
> >
> > I retract my earlier suggestion.
> >
> > I'd prefer to test for '0 CW-compliant' than '0 CW*' because checking for • an
> > exact string match is usually easier. Not supporting wildcards also
> > promotes consistency. Consistency is a Good Thing(tm).
>
> I still think using
>
> 0 FACE ( CW | CCW | DOUBLE-SIDED | UNKNOWN )
Is this the standard now, or at least could we make it the standard ????
Mike
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
56 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
