To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 2982
2981  |  2983
Subject: 
Re: Hidden surface removal, and vertex order in part/primitive DAT files
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Sat, 2 Oct 1999 14:15:02 GMT
Viewed: 
742 times
  
Michael Lachmann wrote in message ...
What if say a complient file contains anything starting with "0 CW". Any
program dealing with this information could just scan for "0 CW*". We also
could use a tag "0 AW*" if why ever the orientation is not clock-wice but
anti-clockwice .... I think a program could deal with that also (just the
sign is different !?).


I retract my earlier suggestion.

I'd prefer to test for '0 CW-compliant' than '0 CW*' because checking for an
exact string match is usually easier.  Not supporting wildcards also
promotes consistency.  Consistency is a Good Thing(tm).

Also, what if 'CW' was someone's initials, and they wanted just their
initials to appear in the file?  It could mistakenly be considered
clockwise-compliant. :)

So if we can define this as a standard, I will build this into MLCad and
Version1.5 and above could make use of this feature (which should speed up
drawing a little bit). By the way any idea how many parts already have this
tag?



My LDraw folder has seven DAT files with '0 CW*', none with '0 CCW*', and 30
with '0 not CW*'.

The seven '0 CW*' files are:

PARTS\973P14.DAT
PARTS\973P15.DAT
PARTS\973P16.DAT
PARTS\973P17.DAT
PARTS\973P18.DAT
PARTS\973P52.DAT
PARTS\578.DAT

Note that 578.DAT contains a suspicious comment :)

I think my part files are current.

-Gary



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Hidden surface removal, and vertex order in part/primitive DAT files
 
Gary Williams: (...) I still think using 0 FACE ( CW | CCW | DOUBLE-SIDED | UNKNOWN ) is most practical. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- (25 years ago, 2-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
  Re: Hidden surface removal, and vertex order in part/primitive DAT files  [DAT]
 
(...) 578 is compliant because it contains *only* subfile references, which have been verified to not mess up (C)CW-ness. But that doesn't mean the *subfiles* are compliant. It also assumes the compliant subfiles are oriented the way the author (me) (...) (25 years ago, 3-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Hidden surface removal, and vertex order in part/primitive DAT files
 
What if say a complient file contains anything starting with "0 CW". Any program dealing with this information could just scan for "0 CW*". We also could use a tag "0 AW*" if why ever the orientation is not clock-wice but anti-clockwice .... I think (...) (25 years ago, 2-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

56 Messages in This Thread:
















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR